RX 9070 XT vs RX 9070
GPU Head-to-Head · FPS & Value Comparison
RX 9070 XT vs RX 9070: Gaming Performance Comparison in 1080p Ultra
In gaming, the RX 9070 XT delivers approximately +9% higher frame rates compared to the RX 9070 in 1080p Ultra (both featuring 16GB VRAM). For budget-conscious buyers, the RX 9070 currently offers +3.9% better value, available at a $80.34 price difference.
RX 9070 XT Advantages
Up to 9% faster in gaming benchmarks on average – 135 vs 124 FPS
RX 9070 Advantages
Up to 3.9% better value for money – $5.03 vs $5.22/FPS
Costs only 89% of the price – $624 vs $704 (11% cheaper)
Consumes up to 28% less energy – 220W vs 304W
Performance Analytics
Average FPS across 21 games · all benchmarks use the same test suite
1080p Medium
Entry / competitive gaming
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (159.1 ÷ 169) × 100 = 94%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((169 - 159.1) ÷ 159.1) × 100 = 6%
You naturally think: "If RX 9070 is only 94% as fast, then RX 9070 XT should be 6% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "6% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (94% of and 6% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
1080p Ultra
Full HD — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (124.1 ÷ 134.8) × 100 = 92%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((134.8 - 124.1) ÷ 124.1) × 100 = 9%
You naturally think: "If RX 9070 is only 92% as fast, then RX 9070 XT should be 8% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "9% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (92% of and 9% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
1440p Ultra
1440p QHD — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (86.3 ÷ 97.6) × 100 = 88%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((97.6 - 86.3) ÷ 86.3) × 100 = 13%
You naturally think: "If RX 9070 is only 88% as fast, then RX 9070 XT should be 12% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "13% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (88% of and 13% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
4K Ultra
3840×2160 — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (53.1 ÷ 61.2) × 100 = 87%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((61.2 - 53.1) ÷ 53.1) × 100 = 15%
You naturally think: "If RX 9070 is only 87% as fast, then RX 9070 XT should be 13% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "15% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (87% of and 15% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
Efficiency Coefficient 1080p Ultra (Higher = Better Value)
Performance delivered per currency unit: FPS/$