RX 9070 XT vs RX 7900 XT
GPU Head-to-Head · FPS & Value Comparison
RX 9070 XT vs RX 7900 XT: Gaming Performance Comparison in 1080p Ultra
In gaming, the RX 9070 XT delivers approximately +4% higher frame rates compared to the RX 7900 XT in 1080p Ultra. For budget-conscious buyers, both GPUs offer almost identical value in 1080p Ultra.
RX 9070 XT Advantages
Up to 4% faster in gaming benchmarks on average – 135 vs 130 FPS
Up to 0.2% better value for money – $5.22 vs $5.23/FPS
Is newer – 2025-03-06 vs 2022-12-13
Consumes up to 3% less energy – 304W vs 315W
RX 7900 XT Advantages
Costs only 97% of the price – $680 vs $704 (3% cheaper)
25% more VRAM memory – 20 vs 16 GB
Performance Analytics
Average FPS across 21 games · all benchmarks use the same test suite
1080p Medium
Entry / competitive gaming
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (163.1 ÷ 169) × 100 = 97%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((169 - 163.1) ÷ 163.1) × 100 = 4%
You naturally think: "If RX 7900 XT is only 97% as fast, then RX 9070 XT should be 3% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "4% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (97% of and 4% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
1080p Ultra
Full HD — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (129.9 ÷ 134.8) × 100 = 96%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((134.8 - 129.9) ÷ 129.9) × 100 = 4%
You naturally think: "If RX 7900 XT is only 96% as fast, then RX 9070 XT should be 4% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "4% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (96% of and 4% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
1440p Ultra
1440p QHD — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (91.4 ÷ 97.6) × 100 = 94%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((97.6 - 91.4) ÷ 91.4) × 100 = 7%
You naturally think: "If RX 7900 XT is only 94% as fast, then RX 9070 XT should be 6% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "7% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (94% of and 7% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
4K Ultra
3840×2160 — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (55.2 ÷ 61.2) × 100 = 90%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((61.2 - 55.2) ÷ 55.2) × 100 = 11%
You naturally think: "If RX 7900 XT is only 90% as fast, then RX 9070 XT should be 10% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "11% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (90% of and 11% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
Efficiency Coefficient 1080p Ultra (Higher = Better Value)
Performance delivered per currency unit: FPS/$