RX 9070 XT vs RTX 5070
GPU Head-to-Head · FPS & Value Comparison
RX 9070 XT vs RTX 5070: Gaming Performance Comparison in 1080p Ultra
In gaming, the RX 9070 XT delivers approximately +12% higher frame rates compared to the RTX 5070 in 1080p Ultra. For budget-conscious buyers, the RTX 5070 currently offers +6.6% better value, available at a $112 price difference.
RX 9070 XT Advantages
Up to 12% faster in gaming benchmarks on average – 135 vs 121 FPS
33% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 12 GB
Is newer – 2025-03-06 vs 2025-03-05
RTX 5070 Advantages
Up to 6.6% better value for money – $4.90 vs $5.22/FPS
Costs only 84% of the price – $592 vs $704 (16% cheaper)
Consumes up to 18% less energy – 250W vs 304W
Performance Analytics
Average FPS across 21 games · all benchmarks use the same test suite
1080p Medium
Entry / competitive gaming
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (149.1 ÷ 169) × 100 = 88%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((169 - 149.1) ÷ 149.1) × 100 = 13%
You naturally think: "If RTX 5070 is only 88% as fast, then RX 9070 XT should be 12% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "13% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (88% of and 13% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
1080p Ultra
Full HD — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (120.7 ÷ 134.8) × 100 = 90%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((134.8 - 120.7) ÷ 120.7) × 100 = 12%
You naturally think: "If RTX 5070 is only 90% as fast, then RX 9070 XT should be 10% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "12% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (90% of and 12% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
1440p Ultra
1440p QHD — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (80.6 ÷ 97.6) × 100 = 83%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((97.6 - 80.6) ÷ 80.6) × 100 = 21%
You naturally think: "If RTX 5070 is only 83% as fast, then RX 9070 XT should be 17% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "21% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (83% of and 21% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
4K Ultra
3840×2160 — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (47.8 ÷ 61.2) × 100 = 78%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((61.2 - 47.8) ÷ 47.8) × 100 = 28%
You naturally think: "If RTX 5070 is only 78% as fast, then RX 9070 XT should be 22% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "28% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (78% of and 28% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
Efficiency Coefficient 1080p Ultra (Higher = Better Value)
Performance delivered per currency unit: FPS/$