RX 9070 XT vs RTX 4070 Ti
GPU Head-to-Head · FPS & Value Comparison
RX 9070 XT vs RTX 4070 Ti: Gaming Performance Comparison in 1080p Ultra
In gaming, the RX 9070 XT delivers approximately +8% higher frame rates compared to the RTX 4070 Ti in 1080p Ultra. For budget-conscious buyers, the RX 9070 XT currently offers +6.9% better value, available at a $5.32 price difference.
RX 9070 XT Advantages
Up to 8% faster in gaming benchmarks on average – 135 vs 125 FPS
Up to 6.9% better value for money – $5.22 vs $5.58/FPS
33% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 12 GB
Is newer – 2025-03-06 vs 2023-01-05
RTX 4070 Ti Advantages
Costs only 99% of the price – $699 vs $704 (1% cheaper)
Consumes up to 6% less energy – 285W vs 304W
Performance Analytics
Average FPS across 21 games · all benchmarks use the same test suite
1080p Medium
Entry / competitive gaming
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (155.1 ÷ 169) × 100 = 92%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((169 - 155.1) ÷ 155.1) × 100 = 9%
You naturally think: "If RTX 4070 Ti is only 92% as fast, then RX 9070 XT should be 8% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "9% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (92% of and 9% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
1080p Ultra
Full HD — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (125.2 ÷ 134.8) × 100 = 93%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((134.8 - 125.2) ÷ 125.2) × 100 = 8%
You naturally think: "If RTX 4070 Ti is only 93% as fast, then RX 9070 XT should be 7% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "8% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (93% of and 8% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
1440p Ultra
1440p QHD — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (84.9 ÷ 97.6) × 100 = 87%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((97.6 - 84.9) ÷ 84.9) × 100 = 15%
You naturally think: "If RTX 4070 Ti is only 87% as fast, then RX 9070 XT should be 13% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "15% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (87% of and 15% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
4K Ultra
3840×2160 — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (49.9 ÷ 61.2) × 100 = 82%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((61.2 - 49.9) ÷ 49.9) × 100 = 23%
You naturally think: "If RTX 4070 Ti is only 82% as fast, then RX 9070 XT should be 18% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "23% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (82% of and 23% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
Efficiency Coefficient 1080p Ultra (Higher = Better Value)
Performance delivered per currency unit: FPS/$