RX 9070 GRE vs RTX 5060 Ti 16GB
GPU Head-to-Head · FPS & Value Comparison
RX 9070 GRE vs RTX 5060 Ti 16GB: Gaming Performance Comparison in 1080p Ultra
In gaming, the RX 9070 GRE delivers approximately +7% higher frame rates compared to the RTX 5060 Ti 16GB in 1080p Ultra. For budget-conscious buyers, the RX 9070 GRE currently offers +6.6% better value, available at a $3.86 price difference.
RX 9070 GRE Advantages
Up to 7% faster in gaming benchmarks on average – 102 vs 95 FPS
Up to 6.6% better value for money – $5.66 vs $6.03/FPS
Is newer – 2025-05-08 vs 2025-04-16
RTX 5060 Ti 16GB Advantages
Costs only 99% of the price – $572 vs $576 (1% cheaper)
33% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 12 GB
Performance Analytics
Average FPS across 21 games · all benchmarks use the same test suite
1080p Medium
Entry / competitive gaming
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (120.3 ÷ 129.7) × 100 = 93%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((129.7 - 120.3) ÷ 120.3) × 100 = 8%
You naturally think: "If RTX 5060 Ti 16GB is only 93% as fast, then RX 9070 GRE should be 7% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "8% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (93% of and 8% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
1080p Ultra
Full HD — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (94.9 ÷ 101.8) × 100 = 93%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((101.8 - 94.9) ÷ 94.9) × 100 = 7%
You naturally think: "If RTX 5060 Ti 16GB is only 93% as fast, then RX 9070 GRE should be 7% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "7% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (93% of and 7% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
1440p Ultra
1440p QHD — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (61.9 ÷ 70.9) × 100 = 87%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((70.9 - 61.9) ÷ 61.9) × 100 = 15%
You naturally think: "If RTX 5060 Ti 16GB is only 87% as fast, then RX 9070 GRE should be 13% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "15% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (87% of and 15% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
4K Ultra
3840×2160 — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (35.7 ÷ 43.6) × 100 = 82%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((43.6 - 35.7) ÷ 35.7) × 100 = 22%
You naturally think: "If RTX 5060 Ti 16GB is only 82% as fast, then RX 9070 GRE should be 18% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "22% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (82% of and 22% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
Efficiency Coefficient 1080p Ultra (Higher = Better Value)
Performance delivered per currency unit: FPS/$