RX 9070 vs RX 9070 GRE
GPU Head-to-Head · FPS & Value Comparison
RX 9070 vs RX 9070 GRE: Gaming Performance Comparison in 1080p Ultra
In gaming, the RX 9070 delivers approximately +22% higher frame rates compared to the RX 9070 GRE in 1080p Ultra. For budget-conscious buyers, the RX 9070 currently offers +13.7% better value, available at a $41.69 price difference.
RX 9070 Advantages
Up to 22% faster in gaming benchmarks on average – 124 vs 102 FPS
Up to 13.7% better value for money – $4.98 vs $5.66/FPS
33% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 12 GB
RX 9070 GRE Advantages
Costs only 93% of the price – $576 vs $618 (7% cheaper)
Is newer – 2025-05-08 vs 2025-03-06
Performance Analytics
Average FPS across 21 games · all benchmarks use the same test suite
1080p Medium
Entry / competitive gaming
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (129.7 ÷ 159.1) × 100 = 82%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((159.1 - 129.7) ÷ 129.7) × 100 = 23%
You naturally think: "If RX 9070 GRE is only 82% as fast, then RX 9070 should be 18% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "23% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (82% of and 23% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
1080p Ultra
Full HD — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (101.8 ÷ 124.1) × 100 = 82%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((124.1 - 101.8) ÷ 101.8) × 100 = 22%
You naturally think: "If RX 9070 GRE is only 82% as fast, then RX 9070 should be 18% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "22% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (82% of and 22% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
1440p Ultra
1440p QHD — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (70.9 ÷ 86.3) × 100 = 82%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((86.3 - 70.9) ÷ 70.9) × 100 = 22%
You naturally think: "If RX 9070 GRE is only 82% as fast, then RX 9070 should be 18% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "22% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (82% of and 22% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
4K Ultra
3840×2160 — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (43.6 ÷ 53.1) × 100 = 82%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((53.1 - 43.6) ÷ 43.6) × 100 = 22%
You naturally think: "If RX 9070 GRE is only 82% as fast, then RX 9070 should be 18% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "22% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (82% of and 22% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
Efficiency Coefficient 1080p Ultra (Higher = Better Value)
Performance delivered per currency unit: FPS/$