RX 9070 vs RX 6900 XT

GPU Head-to-Head · FPS & Value Comparison

RX 9070 vs RX 6900 XT: Gaming Performance Comparison in 1080p Ultra

In gaming, the RX 9070 delivers approximately +27% higher frame rates compared to the RX 6900 XT in 1080p Ultra (both featuring 16GB VRAM). For budget-conscious buyers, the RX 9070 currently offers +39.0% better value, available at a $61.20 price difference.

RX 9070 Advantages

Up to 27% faster in gaming benchmarks on average – 124 vs 98 FPS

Up to 39.0% better value for money – $4.99 vs $6.94/FPS

Costs only 91% of the price – $620 vs $681 (9% cheaper)

Is newer – 2025-03-06 vs 2020-12-08

RX 6900 XT Advantages

Performance Analytics

Average FPS across 21 games · all benchmarks use the same test suite

1080p Ultra

Full HD — max settings

AVG FPS
RX 9070
124.1fps(100%)
RX 6900 XT
98.1fps(79%)
WinnerRX 9070
+27% faster
General Explanation of Benchmark Percentages

When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:

"X% of the performance"

This compares the slower card to the faster card.

Formula: (RX 6900 XT FPS ÷ RX 9070 FPS) × 100
Example: (98.1 ÷ 124.1) × 100 = 79%
"X% faster"

This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.

Formula: ((RX 9070 FPS - RX 6900 XT FPS) ÷ RX 6900 XT FPS) × 100
Example: ((124.1 - 98.1) ÷ 98.1) × 100 = 27%
Why Someone Might Get Confused:

You naturally think: "If RX 6900 XT is only 79% as fast, then RX 9070 should be 21% faster" — but that's incorrect.

The "27% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (79% of and 27% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.

1440p Ultra

1440p QHD — max settings

AVG FPS
RX 9070
86.3fps(100%)
RX 6900 XT
68.4fps(79%)
WinnerRX 9070
+26% faster
General Explanation of Benchmark Percentages

When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:

"X% of the performance"

This compares the slower card to the faster card.

Formula: (RX 6900 XT FPS ÷ RX 9070 FPS) × 100
Example: (68.4 ÷ 86.3) × 100 = 79%
"X% faster"

This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.

Formula: ((RX 9070 FPS - RX 6900 XT FPS) ÷ RX 6900 XT FPS) × 100
Example: ((86.3 - 68.4) ÷ 68.4) × 100 = 26%
Why Someone Might Get Confused:

You naturally think: "If RX 6900 XT is only 79% as fast, then RX 9070 should be 21% faster" — but that's incorrect.

The "26% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (79% of and 26% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.

4K Ultra

3840×2160 — max settings

AVG FPS
RX 9070
53.1fps(100%)
RX 6900 XT
42fps(79%)
WinnerRX 9070
+26% faster
General Explanation of Benchmark Percentages

When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:

"X% of the performance"

This compares the slower card to the faster card.

Formula: (RX 6900 XT FPS ÷ RX 9070 FPS) × 100
Example: (42 ÷ 53.1) × 100 = 79%
"X% faster"

This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.

Formula: ((RX 9070 FPS - RX 6900 XT FPS) ÷ RX 6900 XT FPS) × 100
Example: ((53.1 - 42) ÷ 42) × 100 = 26%
Why Someone Might Get Confused:

You naturally think: "If RX 6900 XT is only 79% as fast, then RX 9070 should be 21% faster" — but that's incorrect.

The "26% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (79% of and 26% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.

Efficiency Coefficient 1080p Ultra (Higher = Better Value)

Performance delivered per currency unit: FPS/$

RX 9070
0.200 Value100% Efficiency
RX 6900 XT
0.144 Value72% Efficiency