RX 9060 XT 8GB vs RX 7700 XT
GPU Head-to-Head · FPS & Value Comparison
RX 9060 XT 8GB vs RX 7700 XT: Gaming Performance Comparison in 1080p Ultra
In gaming, the RX 9060 XT 8GB delivers approximately +4% higher frame rates compared to the RX 7700 XT in 1080p Ultra. For budget-conscious buyers, the RX 9060 XT 8GB currently offers +8.3% better value, available at a $15.08 price difference.
RX 9060 XT 8GB Advantages
Up to 4% faster in gaming benchmarks on average – 84 vs 81 FPS
Up to 8.3% better value for money – $4.55 vs $4.93/FPS
Costs only 96% of the price – $382 vs $397 (4% cheaper)
Is newer – 2025-05-21 vs 2023-09-06
RX 7700 XT Advantages
50% more VRAM memory – 12 vs 8 GB
Performance Analytics
Average FPS across 21 games · all benchmarks use the same test suite
1080p Medium
Entry / competitive gaming
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (106.8 ÷ 114.5) × 100 = 93%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((114.5 - 106.8) ÷ 106.8) × 100 = 7%
You naturally think: "If RX 9060 XT 8GB is only 93% as fast, then RX 7700 XT should be 7% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "7% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (93% of and 7% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
1080p Ultra
Full HD — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (80.6 ÷ 84) × 100 = 96%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((84 - 80.6) ÷ 80.6) × 100 = 4%
You naturally think: "If RX 7700 XT is only 96% as fast, then RX 9060 XT 8GB should be 4% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "4% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (96% of and 4% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
1440p Ultra
1440p QHD — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (48.2 ÷ 60.2) × 100 = 80%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((60.2 - 48.2) ÷ 48.2) × 100 = 25%
You naturally think: "If RX 9060 XT 8GB is only 80% as fast, then RX 7700 XT should be 20% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "25% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (80% of and 25% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
4K Ultra
3840×2160 — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (24.4 ÷ 34.7) × 100 = 70%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((34.7 - 24.4) ÷ 24.4) × 100 = 42%
You naturally think: "If RX 9060 XT 8GB is only 70% as fast, then RX 7700 XT should be 30% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "42% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (70% of and 42% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
Efficiency Coefficient 1080p Ultra (Higher = Better Value)
Performance delivered per currency unit: FPS/$