RX 9060 XT 16GB vs RX 6800

GPU Head-to-Head · FPS & Value Comparison

RX 9060 XT 16GB vs RX 6800: Gaming Performance Comparison in 1080p Ultra

In gaming, the RX 9060 XT 16GB delivers approximately +7% higher frame rates compared to the RX 6800 in 1080p Ultra (both featuring 16GB VRAM). For budget-conscious buyers, the RX 6800 currently offers +6.5% better value, available at a $57.25 price difference.

RX 9060 XT 16GB Advantages

Up to 7% faster in gaming benchmarks on average – 90 vs 84 FPS

Is newer – 2025-05-21 vs 2020-11-18

Consumes up to 36% less energy – 160W vs 250W

RX 6800 Advantages

Up to 6.5% better value for money – $4.76 vs $5.06/FPS

Costs only 87% of the price – $400 vs $457 (13% cheaper)

Performance Analytics

Average FPS across 21 games · all benchmarks use the same test suite

1080p Ultra

Full HD — max settings

AVG FPS
RX 9060 XT 16GB
90.3fps(100%)
RX 6800
84.1fps(93%)
WinnerRX 9060 XT 16GB
+7% faster
General Explanation of Benchmark Percentages

When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:

"X% of the performance"

This compares the slower card to the faster card.

Formula: (RX 6800 FPS ÷ RX 9060 XT 16GB FPS) × 100
Example: (84.1 ÷ 90.3) × 100 = 93%
"X% faster"

This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.

Formula: ((RX 9060 XT 16GB FPS - RX 6800 FPS) ÷ RX 6800 FPS) × 100
Example: ((90.3 - 84.1) ÷ 84.1) × 100 = 7%
Why Someone Might Get Confused:

You naturally think: "If RX 6800 is only 93% as fast, then RX 9060 XT 16GB should be 7% faster" — but that's incorrect.

The "7% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (93% of and 7% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.

1440p Ultra

1440p QHD — max settings

AVG FPS
RX 9060 XT 16GB
59fps(100%)
RX 6800
57.7fps(98%)
WinnerRX 9060 XT 16GB
+2% faster
General Explanation of Benchmark Percentages

When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:

"X% of the performance"

This compares the slower card to the faster card.

Formula: (RX 6800 FPS ÷ RX 9060 XT 16GB FPS) × 100
Example: (57.7 ÷ 59) × 100 = 98%
"X% faster"

This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.

Formula: ((RX 9060 XT 16GB FPS - RX 6800 FPS) ÷ RX 6800 FPS) × 100
Example: ((59 - 57.7) ÷ 57.7) × 100 = 2%
Why Someone Might Get Confused:

You naturally think: "If RX 6800 is only 98% as fast, then RX 9060 XT 16GB should be 2% faster" — but that's incorrect.

The "2% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (98% of and 2% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.

4K Ultra

3840×2160 — max settings

AVG FPS
RX 9060 XT 16GB
33.9fps(99%)
RX 6800
34.1fps(100%)
WinnerRX 6800
+1% faster
General Explanation of Benchmark Percentages

When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:

"X% of the performance"

This compares the slower card to the faster card.

Formula: (RX 9060 XT 16GB FPS ÷ RX 6800 FPS) × 100
Example: (33.9 ÷ 34.1) × 100 = 99%
"X% faster"

This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.

Formula: ((RX 6800 FPS - RX 9060 XT 16GB FPS) ÷ RX 9060 XT 16GB FPS) × 100
Example: ((34.1 - 33.9) ÷ 33.9) × 100 = 1%
Why Someone Might Get Confused:

You naturally think: "If RX 9060 XT 16GB is only 99% as fast, then RX 6800 should be 1% faster" — but that's incorrect.

The "1% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (99% of and 1% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.

Efficiency Coefficient 1080p Ultra (Higher = Better Value)

Performance delivered per currency unit: FPS/$

RX 9060 XT 16GB
0.197 Value94% Efficiency
RX 6800
0.210 Value100% Efficiency