RX 9060 XT 16GB vs RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
GPU Head-to-Head · FPS & Value Comparison
RX 9060 XT 16GB vs RTX 4060 Ti 16GB: Gaming Performance Comparison in 1080p Ultra
In gaming, the RX 9060 XT 16GB delivers approximately +10% higher frame rates compared to the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB in 1080p Ultra (both featuring 16GB VRAM). For budget-conscious buyers, the RX 9060 XT 16GB currently offers +53.3% better value, available at a $178 price difference.
RX 9060 XT 16GB Advantages
Up to 10% faster in gaming benchmarks on average – 90 vs 82 FPS
Up to 53.3% better value for money – $5.07 vs $7.77/FPS
Costs only 72% of the price – $457 vs $635 (28% cheaper)
Is newer – 2025-05-21 vs 2023-07-18
RTX 4060 Ti 16GB Advantages
Performance Analytics
Average FPS across 21 games · all benchmarks use the same test suite
1080p Medium
Entry / competitive gaming
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (103.5 ÷ 117.7) × 100 = 88%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((117.7 - 103.5) ÷ 103.5) × 100 = 14%
You naturally think: "If RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is only 88% as fast, then RX 9060 XT 16GB should be 12% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "14% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (88% of and 14% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
1080p Ultra
Full HD — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (81.8 ÷ 90.3) × 100 = 91%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((90.3 - 81.8) ÷ 81.8) × 100 = 10%
You naturally think: "If RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is only 91% as fast, then RX 9060 XT 16GB should be 9% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "10% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (91% of and 10% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
1440p Ultra
1440p QHD — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (52.1 ÷ 59) × 100 = 88%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((59 - 52.1) ÷ 52.1) × 100 = 13%
You naturally think: "If RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is only 88% as fast, then RX 9060 XT 16GB should be 12% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "13% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (88% of and 13% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
4K Ultra
3840×2160 — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (29.3 ÷ 33.9) × 100 = 86%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((33.9 - 29.3) ÷ 29.3) × 100 = 16%
You naturally think: "If RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is only 86% as fast, then RX 9060 XT 16GB should be 14% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "16% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (86% of and 16% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
Efficiency Coefficient 1080p Ultra (Higher = Better Value)
Performance delivered per currency unit: FPS/$