RX 7900 XTX vs RTX 4070 Ti
GPU Head-to-Head · FPS & Value Comparison
RX 7900 XTX vs RTX 4070 Ti: Gaming Performance Comparison in 1080p Ultra
In gaming, the RX 7900 XTX delivers approximately +12% higher frame rates compared to the RTX 4070 Ti in 1080p Ultra. For budget-conscious buyers, the RTX 4070 Ti currently offers +3.9% better value, available at a $117 price difference.
RX 7900 XTX Advantages
Up to 12% faster in gaming benchmarks on average – 141 vs 125 FPS
100% more VRAM memory – 24 vs 12 GB
RTX 4070 Ti Advantages
Up to 3.9% better value for money – $5.58 vs $5.80/FPS
Costs only 86% of the price – $699 vs $816 (14% cheaper)
Is newer – 2023-01-05 vs 2022-12-13
Consumes up to 20% less energy – 285W vs 355W
Performance Analytics
Average FPS across 21 games · all benchmarks use the same test suite
1080p Medium
Entry / competitive gaming
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (155.1 ÷ 174.1) × 100 = 89%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((174.1 - 155.1) ÷ 155.1) × 100 = 12%
You naturally think: "If RTX 4070 Ti is only 89% as fast, then RX 7900 XTX should be 11% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "12% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (89% of and 12% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
1080p Ultra
Full HD — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (125.2 ÷ 140.7) × 100 = 89%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((140.7 - 125.2) ÷ 125.2) × 100 = 12%
You naturally think: "If RTX 4070 Ti is only 89% as fast, then RX 7900 XTX should be 11% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "12% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (89% of and 12% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
1440p Ultra
1440p QHD — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (84.9 ÷ 101.9) × 100 = 83%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((101.9 - 84.9) ÷ 84.9) × 100 = 20%
You naturally think: "If RTX 4070 Ti is only 83% as fast, then RX 7900 XTX should be 17% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "20% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (83% of and 20% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
4K Ultra
3840×2160 — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (49.9 ÷ 64.5) × 100 = 77%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((64.5 - 49.9) ÷ 49.9) × 100 = 29%
You naturally think: "If RTX 4070 Ti is only 77% as fast, then RX 7900 XTX should be 23% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "29% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (77% of and 29% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
Efficiency Coefficient 1080p Ultra (Higher = Better Value)
Performance delivered per currency unit: FPS/$