RX 7900 XT vs RX 9070
GPU Head-to-Head · FPS & Value Comparison
RX 7900 XT vs RX 9070: Gaming Performance Comparison in 1080p Ultra
In gaming, the RX 7900 XT delivers approximately +5% higher frame rates compared to the RX 9070 in 1080p Ultra. For budget-conscious buyers, the RX 9070 currently offers +4.1% better value, available at a $56.21 price difference.
RX 7900 XT Advantages
Up to 5% faster in gaming benchmarks on average – 130 vs 124 FPS
25% more VRAM memory – 20 vs 16 GB
RX 9070 Advantages
Up to 4.1% better value for money – $5.03 vs $5.23/FPS
Costs only 92% of the price – $624 vs $680 (8% cheaper)
Is newer – 2025-03-06 vs 2022-12-13
Consumes up to 30% less energy – 220W vs 315W
Performance Analytics
Average FPS across 21 games · all benchmarks use the same test suite
1080p Medium
Entry / competitive gaming
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (159.1 ÷ 163.1) × 100 = 98%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((163.1 - 159.1) ÷ 159.1) × 100 = 3%
You naturally think: "If RX 9070 is only 98% as fast, then RX 7900 XT should be 2% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "3% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (98% of and 3% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
1080p Ultra
Full HD — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (124.1 ÷ 129.9) × 100 = 96%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((129.9 - 124.1) ÷ 124.1) × 100 = 5%
You naturally think: "If RX 9070 is only 96% as fast, then RX 7900 XT should be 4% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "5% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (96% of and 5% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
1440p Ultra
1440p QHD — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (86.3 ÷ 91.4) × 100 = 94%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((91.4 - 86.3) ÷ 86.3) × 100 = 6%
You naturally think: "If RX 9070 is only 94% as fast, then RX 7900 XT should be 6% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "6% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (94% of and 6% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
4K Ultra
3840×2160 — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (53.1 ÷ 55.2) × 100 = 96%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((55.2 - 53.1) ÷ 53.1) × 100 = 4%
You naturally think: "If RX 9070 is only 96% as fast, then RX 7900 XT should be 4% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "4% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (96% of and 4% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
Efficiency Coefficient 1080p Ultra (Higher = Better Value)
Performance delivered per currency unit: FPS/$