RX 7900 XT vs RTX 5070
GPU Head-to-Head · FPS & Value Comparison
RX 7900 XT vs RTX 5070: Gaming Performance Comparison in 1080p Ultra
In gaming, the RX 7900 XT delivers approximately +8% higher frame rates compared to the RTX 5070 in 1080p Ultra. For budget-conscious buyers, the RTX 5070 currently offers +6.8% better value, available at a $88.29 price difference.
RX 7900 XT Advantages
Up to 8% faster in gaming benchmarks on average – 130 vs 121 FPS
67% more VRAM memory – 20 vs 12 GB
RTX 5070 Advantages
Up to 6.8% better value for money – $4.90 vs $5.23/FPS
Costs only 87% of the price – $592 vs $680 (13% cheaper)
Is newer – 2025-03-05 vs 2022-12-13
Consumes up to 21% less energy – 250W vs 315W
Performance Analytics
Average FPS across 21 games · all benchmarks use the same test suite
1080p Medium
Entry / competitive gaming
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (149.1 ÷ 163.1) × 100 = 91%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((163.1 - 149.1) ÷ 149.1) × 100 = 9%
You naturally think: "If RTX 5070 is only 91% as fast, then RX 7900 XT should be 9% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "9% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (91% of and 9% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
1080p Ultra
Full HD — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (120.7 ÷ 129.9) × 100 = 93%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((129.9 - 120.7) ÷ 120.7) × 100 = 8%
You naturally think: "If RTX 5070 is only 93% as fast, then RX 7900 XT should be 7% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "8% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (93% of and 8% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
1440p Ultra
1440p QHD — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (80.6 ÷ 91.4) × 100 = 88%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((91.4 - 80.6) ÷ 80.6) × 100 = 13%
You naturally think: "If RTX 5070 is only 88% as fast, then RX 7900 XT should be 12% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "13% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (88% of and 13% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
4K Ultra
3840×2160 — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (47.8 ÷ 55.2) × 100 = 87%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((55.2 - 47.8) ÷ 47.8) × 100 = 15%
You naturally think: "If RTX 5070 is only 87% as fast, then RX 7900 XT should be 13% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "15% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (87% of and 15% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
Efficiency Coefficient 1080p Ultra (Higher = Better Value)
Performance delivered per currency unit: FPS/$