RX 7900 XT vs RTX 4070 Ti
GPU Head-to-Head · FPS & Value Comparison
RX 7900 XT vs RTX 4070 Ti: Gaming Performance Comparison in 1080p Ultra
In gaming, the RX 7900 XT delivers approximately +4% higher frame rates compared to the RTX 4070 Ti in 1080p Ultra. For budget-conscious buyers, the RX 7900 XT currently offers +6.6% better value, available at a $18.81 price difference.
RX 7900 XT Advantages
Up to 4% faster in gaming benchmarks on average – 130 vs 125 FPS
Up to 6.6% better value for money – $5.23 vs $5.58/FPS
Costs only 97% of the price – $680 vs $699 (3% cheaper)
67% more VRAM memory – 20 vs 12 GB
RTX 4070 Ti Advantages
Is newer – 2023-01-05 vs 2022-12-13
Consumes up to 10% less energy – 285W vs 315W
Performance Analytics
Average FPS across 21 games · all benchmarks use the same test suite
1080p Medium
Entry / competitive gaming
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (155.1 ÷ 163.1) × 100 = 95%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((163.1 - 155.1) ÷ 155.1) × 100 = 5%
You naturally think: "If RTX 4070 Ti is only 95% as fast, then RX 7900 XT should be 5% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "5% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (95% of and 5% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
1080p Ultra
Full HD — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (125.2 ÷ 129.9) × 100 = 96%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((129.9 - 125.2) ÷ 125.2) × 100 = 4%
You naturally think: "If RTX 4070 Ti is only 96% as fast, then RX 7900 XT should be 4% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "4% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (96% of and 4% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
1440p Ultra
1440p QHD — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (84.9 ÷ 91.4) × 100 = 93%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((91.4 - 84.9) ÷ 84.9) × 100 = 8%
You naturally think: "If RTX 4070 Ti is only 93% as fast, then RX 7900 XT should be 7% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "8% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (93% of and 8% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
4K Ultra
3840×2160 — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (49.9 ÷ 55.2) × 100 = 90%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((55.2 - 49.9) ÷ 49.9) × 100 = 11%
You naturally think: "If RTX 4070 Ti is only 90% as fast, then RX 7900 XT should be 10% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "11% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (90% of and 11% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
Efficiency Coefficient 1080p Ultra (Higher = Better Value)
Performance delivered per currency unit: FPS/$