RX 7900 XT vs RTX 4070 Super
GPU Head-to-Head · FPS & Value Comparison
RX 7900 XT vs RTX 4070 Super: Gaming Performance Comparison in 1080p Ultra
In gaming, the RX 7900 XT delivers approximately +9% higher frame rates compared to the RTX 4070 Super in 1080p Ultra. For budget-conscious buyers, the RX 7900 XT currently offers +10.0% better value, available at a $5.69 price difference.
RX 7900 XT Advantages
Up to 9% faster in gaming benchmarks on average – 130 vs 119 FPS
Up to 10.0% better value for money – $5.23 vs $5.76/FPS
Costs only 99% of the price – $680 vs $686 (1% cheaper)
67% more VRAM memory – 20 vs 12 GB
RTX 4070 Super Advantages
Is newer – 2024-01-17 vs 2022-12-13
Consumes up to 30% less energy – 220W vs 315W
Performance Analytics
Average FPS across 21 games · all benchmarks use the same test suite
1080p Medium
Entry / competitive gaming
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (147.6 ÷ 163.1) × 100 = 90%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((163.1 - 147.6) ÷ 147.6) × 100 = 11%
You naturally think: "If RTX 4070 Super is only 90% as fast, then RX 7900 XT should be 10% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "11% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (90% of and 11% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
1080p Ultra
Full HD — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (119.1 ÷ 129.9) × 100 = 92%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((129.9 - 119.1) ÷ 119.1) × 100 = 9%
You naturally think: "If RTX 4070 Super is only 92% as fast, then RX 7900 XT should be 8% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "9% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (92% of and 9% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
1440p Ultra
1440p QHD — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (79.2 ÷ 91.4) × 100 = 87%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((91.4 - 79.2) ÷ 79.2) × 100 = 15%
You naturally think: "If RTX 4070 Super is only 87% as fast, then RX 7900 XT should be 13% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "15% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (87% of and 15% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
4K Ultra
3840×2160 — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (46 ÷ 55.2) × 100 = 83%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((55.2 - 46) ÷ 46) × 100 = 20%
You naturally think: "If RTX 4070 Super is only 83% as fast, then RX 7900 XT should be 17% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "20% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (83% of and 20% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
Efficiency Coefficient 1080p Ultra (Higher = Better Value)
Performance delivered per currency unit: FPS/$