RX 7800 XT vs RX 9060 XT 16GB
GPU Head-to-Head · FPS & Value Comparison
RX 7800 XT vs RX 9060 XT 16GB: Gaming Performance Comparison in 1080p Ultra
In gaming, the RX 7800 XT delivers approximately +5% higher frame rates compared to the RX 9060 XT 16GB in 1080p Ultra (both featuring 16GB VRAM). For budget-conscious buyers, the RX 9060 XT 16GB currently offers +12.1% better value, available at a $80.69 price difference.
RX 7800 XT Advantages
Up to 5% faster in gaming benchmarks on average – 95 vs 90 FPS
RX 9060 XT 16GB Advantages
Up to 12.1% better value for money – $5.07 vs $5.68/FPS
Costs only 85% of the price – $457 vs $538 (15% cheaper)
Is newer – 2025-05-21 vs 2023-09-06
Consumes up to 39% less energy – 160W vs 263W
Performance Analytics
Average FPS across 21 games · all benchmarks use the same test suite
1080p Medium
Entry / competitive gaming
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (117.7 ÷ 133.2) × 100 = 88%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((133.2 - 117.7) ÷ 117.7) × 100 = 13%
You naturally think: "If RX 9060 XT 16GB is only 88% as fast, then RX 7800 XT should be 12% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "13% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (88% of and 13% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
1080p Ultra
Full HD — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (90.3 ÷ 94.8) × 100 = 95%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((94.8 - 90.3) ÷ 90.3) × 100 = 5%
You naturally think: "If RX 9060 XT 16GB is only 95% as fast, then RX 7800 XT should be 5% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "5% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (95% of and 5% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
1440p Ultra
1440p QHD — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (59 ÷ 68.5) × 100 = 86%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((68.5 - 59) ÷ 59) × 100 = 16%
You naturally think: "If RX 9060 XT 16GB is only 86% as fast, then RX 7800 XT should be 14% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "16% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (86% of and 16% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
4K Ultra
3840×2160 — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (33.9 ÷ 40.7) × 100 = 83%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((40.7 - 33.9) ÷ 33.9) × 100 = 20%
You naturally think: "If RX 9060 XT 16GB is only 83% as fast, then RX 7800 XT should be 17% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "20% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (83% of and 20% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
Efficiency Coefficient 1080p Ultra (Higher = Better Value)
Performance delivered per currency unit: FPS/$