RX 7600 vs A770 16GB
GPU Head-to-Head · FPS & Value Comparison
RX 7600 vs A770 16GB: Gaming Performance Comparison in 1080p Ultra
In gaming, the RX 7600 delivers approximately +1% higher frame rates compared to the A770 16GB in 1080p Ultra. For budget-conscious buyers, the RX 7600 currently offers +16.4% better value, available at a $44.37 price difference.
RX 7600 Advantages
Up to 1% faster in gaming benchmarks on average – 54 vs 53 FPS
Up to 16.4% better value for money – $5.57 vs $6.48/FPS
Costs only 87% of the price – $298 vs $342 (13% cheaper)
Is newer – 2023-05-25 vs 2022-10-01
A770 16GB Advantages
100% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 8 GB
Performance Analytics
Average FPS across 21 games · all benchmarks use the same test suite
1080p Medium
Entry / competitive gaming
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (63.4 ÷ 79.3) × 100 = 80%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((79.3 - 63.4) ÷ 63.4) × 100 = 25%
You naturally think: "If A770 16GB is only 80% as fast, then RX 7600 should be 20% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "25% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (80% of and 25% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
1080p Ultra
Full HD — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (52.8 ÷ 53.5) × 100 = 99%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((53.5 - 52.8) ÷ 52.8) × 100 = 1%
You naturally think: "If A770 16GB is only 99% as fast, then RX 7600 should be 1% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "1% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (99% of and 1% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
1440p Ultra
1440p QHD — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (27.7 ÷ 36.5) × 100 = 76%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((36.5 - 27.7) ÷ 27.7) × 100 = 32%
You naturally think: "If RX 7600 is only 76% as fast, then A770 16GB should be 24% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "32% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (76% of and 32% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
4K Ultra
3840×2160 — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (12.8 ÷ 22.3) × 100 = 57%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((22.3 - 12.8) ÷ 12.8) × 100 = 74%
You naturally think: "If RX 7600 is only 57% as fast, then A770 16GB should be 43% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "74% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (57% of and 74% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
Efficiency Coefficient 1080p Ultra (Higher = Better Value)
Performance delivered per currency unit: FPS/$