RX 6800 XT vs RX 9060 XT 16GB

GPU Head-to-Head · FPS & Value Comparison

RX 6800 XT vs RX 9060 XT 16GB: Gaming Performance Comparison in 1080p Ultra

In gaming, the RX 6800 XT delivers approximately +4% higher frame rates compared to the RX 9060 XT 16GB in 1080p Ultra (both featuring 16GB VRAM). For budget-conscious buyers, the RX 9060 XT 16GB currently offers +12.5% better value, available at a $75.76 price difference.

RX 6800 XT Advantages

Up to 4% faster in gaming benchmarks on average – 94 vs 90 FPS

RX 9060 XT 16GB Advantages

Up to 12.5% better value for money – $5.06 vs $5.69/FPS

Costs only 86% of the price – $457 vs $533 (14% cheaper)

Is newer – 2025-05-21 vs 2020-11-18

Consumes up to 47% less energy – 160W vs 300W

Performance Analytics

Average FPS across 21 games · all benchmarks use the same test suite

1080p Ultra

Full HD — max settings

AVG FPS
RX 6800 XT
93.6fps(100%)
RX 9060 XT 16GB
90.3fps(96%)
WinnerRX 6800 XT
+4% faster
General Explanation of Benchmark Percentages

When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:

"X% of the performance"

This compares the slower card to the faster card.

Formula: (RX 9060 XT 16GB FPS ÷ RX 6800 XT FPS) × 100
Example: (90.3 ÷ 93.6) × 100 = 96%
"X% faster"

This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.

Formula: ((RX 6800 XT FPS - RX 9060 XT 16GB FPS) ÷ RX 9060 XT 16GB FPS) × 100
Example: ((93.6 - 90.3) ÷ 90.3) × 100 = 4%
Why Someone Might Get Confused:

You naturally think: "If RX 9060 XT 16GB is only 96% as fast, then RX 6800 XT should be 4% faster" — but that's incorrect.

The "4% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (96% of and 4% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.

1440p Ultra

1440p QHD — max settings

AVG FPS
RX 6800 XT
64.8fps(100%)
RX 9060 XT 16GB
59fps(91%)
WinnerRX 6800 XT
+10% faster
General Explanation of Benchmark Percentages

When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:

"X% of the performance"

This compares the slower card to the faster card.

Formula: (RX 9060 XT 16GB FPS ÷ RX 6800 XT FPS) × 100
Example: (59 ÷ 64.8) × 100 = 91%
"X% faster"

This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.

Formula: ((RX 6800 XT FPS - RX 9060 XT 16GB FPS) ÷ RX 9060 XT 16GB FPS) × 100
Example: ((64.8 - 59) ÷ 59) × 100 = 10%
Why Someone Might Get Confused:

You naturally think: "If RX 9060 XT 16GB is only 91% as fast, then RX 6800 XT should be 9% faster" — but that's incorrect.

The "10% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (91% of and 10% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.

4K Ultra

3840×2160 — max settings

AVG FPS
RX 6800 XT
39.3fps(100%)
RX 9060 XT 16GB
33.9fps(86%)
WinnerRX 6800 XT
+16% faster
General Explanation of Benchmark Percentages

When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:

"X% of the performance"

This compares the slower card to the faster card.

Formula: (RX 9060 XT 16GB FPS ÷ RX 6800 XT FPS) × 100
Example: (33.9 ÷ 39.3) × 100 = 86%
"X% faster"

This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.

Formula: ((RX 6800 XT FPS - RX 9060 XT 16GB FPS) ÷ RX 9060 XT 16GB FPS) × 100
Example: ((39.3 - 33.9) ÷ 33.9) × 100 = 16%
Why Someone Might Get Confused:

You naturally think: "If RX 9060 XT 16GB is only 86% as fast, then RX 6800 XT should be 14% faster" — but that's incorrect.

The "16% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (86% of and 16% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.

Efficiency Coefficient 1080p Ultra (Higher = Better Value)

Performance delivered per currency unit: FPS/$

RX 6800 XT
0.176 Value89% Efficiency
RX 9060 XT 16GB
0.197 Value100% Efficiency