RX 6800 XT vs RX 6800

GPU Head-to-Head · FPS & Value Comparison

RX 6800 XT vs RX 6800: Gaming Performance Comparison in 1080p Ultra

In gaming, the RX 6800 XT delivers approximately +11% higher frame rates compared to the RX 6800 in 1080p Ultra (both featuring 16GB VRAM). For budget-conscious buyers, the RX 6800 currently offers +19.7% better value, available at a $133 price difference.

RX 6800 XT Advantages

Up to 11% faster in gaming benchmarks on average – 94 vs 84 FPS

RX 6800 Advantages

Up to 19.7% better value for money – $4.76 vs $5.69/FPS

Costs only 75% of the price – $400 vs $533 (25% cheaper)

Consumes up to 17% less energy – 250W vs 300W

Performance Analytics

Average FPS across 21 games · all benchmarks use the same test suite

1080p Ultra

Full HD — max settings

AVG FPS
RX 6800 XT
93.6fps(100%)
RX 6800
84.1fps(90%)
WinnerRX 6800 XT
+11% faster
General Explanation of Benchmark Percentages

When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:

"X% of the performance"

This compares the slower card to the faster card.

Formula: (RX 6800 FPS ÷ RX 6800 XT FPS) × 100
Example: (84.1 ÷ 93.6) × 100 = 90%
"X% faster"

This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.

Formula: ((RX 6800 XT FPS - RX 6800 FPS) ÷ RX 6800 FPS) × 100
Example: ((93.6 - 84.1) ÷ 84.1) × 100 = 11%
Why Someone Might Get Confused:

You naturally think: "If RX 6800 is only 90% as fast, then RX 6800 XT should be 10% faster" — but that's incorrect.

The "11% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (90% of and 11% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.

1440p Ultra

1440p QHD — max settings

AVG FPS
RX 6800 XT
64.8fps(100%)
RX 6800
57.7fps(89%)
WinnerRX 6800 XT
+12% faster
General Explanation of Benchmark Percentages

When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:

"X% of the performance"

This compares the slower card to the faster card.

Formula: (RX 6800 FPS ÷ RX 6800 XT FPS) × 100
Example: (57.7 ÷ 64.8) × 100 = 89%
"X% faster"

This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.

Formula: ((RX 6800 XT FPS - RX 6800 FPS) ÷ RX 6800 FPS) × 100
Example: ((64.8 - 57.7) ÷ 57.7) × 100 = 12%
Why Someone Might Get Confused:

You naturally think: "If RX 6800 is only 89% as fast, then RX 6800 XT should be 11% faster" — but that's incorrect.

The "12% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (89% of and 12% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.

4K Ultra

3840×2160 — max settings

AVG FPS
RX 6800 XT
39.3fps(100%)
RX 6800
34.1fps(87%)
WinnerRX 6800 XT
+15% faster
General Explanation of Benchmark Percentages

When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:

"X% of the performance"

This compares the slower card to the faster card.

Formula: (RX 6800 FPS ÷ RX 6800 XT FPS) × 100
Example: (34.1 ÷ 39.3) × 100 = 87%
"X% faster"

This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.

Formula: ((RX 6800 XT FPS - RX 6800 FPS) ÷ RX 6800 FPS) × 100
Example: ((39.3 - 34.1) ÷ 34.1) × 100 = 15%
Why Someone Might Get Confused:

You naturally think: "If RX 6800 is only 87% as fast, then RX 6800 XT should be 13% faster" — but that's incorrect.

The "15% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (87% of and 15% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.

Efficiency Coefficient 1080p Ultra (Higher = Better Value)

Performance delivered per currency unit: FPS/$

RX 6800 XT
0.176 Value84% Efficiency
RX 6800
0.210 Value100% Efficiency