RX 6700 XT vs RX 7600 XT

GPU Head-to-Head · FPS & Value Comparison

RX 6700 XT vs RX 7600 XT: Gaming Performance Comparison in 1080p Ultra

In gaming, the RX 6700 XT delivers approximately +8% higher frame rates compared to the RX 7600 XT in 1080p Ultra. For budget-conscious buyers, the RX 6700 XT currently offers +18.1% better value, available at a $32.82 price difference.

RX 6700 XT Advantages

Up to 8% faster in gaming benchmarks on average – 64 vs 60 FPS

Up to 18.1% better value for money – $5.37 vs $6.35/FPS

Costs only 91% of the price – $345 vs $378 (9% cheaper)

RX 7600 XT Advantages

33% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 12 GB

Is newer – 2024-01-24 vs 2021-03-18

Consumes up to 17% less energy – 190W vs 230W

Performance Analytics

Average FPS across 21 games · all benchmarks use the same test suite

1080p Ultra

Full HD — max settings

AVG FPS
RX 6700 XT
64.3fps(100%)
RX 7600 XT
59.6fps(93%)
WinnerRX 6700 XT
+8% faster
General Explanation of Benchmark Percentages

When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:

"X% of the performance"

This compares the slower card to the faster card.

Formula: (RX 7600 XT FPS ÷ RX 6700 XT FPS) × 100
Example: (59.6 ÷ 64.3) × 100 = 93%
"X% faster"

This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.

Formula: ((RX 6700 XT FPS - RX 7600 XT FPS) ÷ RX 7600 XT FPS) × 100
Example: ((64.3 - 59.6) ÷ 59.6) × 100 = 8%
Why Someone Might Get Confused:

You naturally think: "If RX 7600 XT is only 93% as fast, then RX 6700 XT should be 7% faster" — but that's incorrect.

The "8% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (93% of and 8% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.

1440p Ultra

1440p QHD — max settings

AVG FPS
RX 6700 XT
47.9fps(100%)
RX 7600 XT
41.4fps(86%)
WinnerRX 6700 XT
+16% faster
General Explanation of Benchmark Percentages

When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:

"X% of the performance"

This compares the slower card to the faster card.

Formula: (RX 7600 XT FPS ÷ RX 6700 XT FPS) × 100
Example: (41.4 ÷ 47.9) × 100 = 86%
"X% faster"

This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.

Formula: ((RX 6700 XT FPS - RX 7600 XT FPS) ÷ RX 7600 XT FPS) × 100
Example: ((47.9 - 41.4) ÷ 41.4) × 100 = 16%
Why Someone Might Get Confused:

You naturally think: "If RX 7600 XT is only 86% as fast, then RX 6700 XT should be 14% faster" — but that's incorrect.

The "16% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (86% of and 16% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.

4K Ultra

3840×2160 — max settings

AVG FPS
RX 6700 XT
26.9fps(100%)
RX 7600 XT
22.7fps(84%)
WinnerRX 6700 XT
+19% faster
General Explanation of Benchmark Percentages

When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:

"X% of the performance"

This compares the slower card to the faster card.

Formula: (RX 7600 XT FPS ÷ RX 6700 XT FPS) × 100
Example: (22.7 ÷ 26.9) × 100 = 84%
"X% faster"

This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.

Formula: ((RX 6700 XT FPS - RX 7600 XT FPS) ÷ RX 7600 XT FPS) × 100
Example: ((26.9 - 22.7) ÷ 22.7) × 100 = 19%
Why Someone Might Get Confused:

You naturally think: "If RX 7600 XT is only 84% as fast, then RX 6700 XT should be 16% faster" — but that's incorrect.

The "19% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (84% of and 19% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.

Efficiency Coefficient 1080p Ultra (Higher = Better Value)

Performance delivered per currency unit: FPS/$

RX 6700 XT
0.186 Value100% Efficiency
RX 7600 XT
0.158 Value85% Efficiency