RX 6700 XT vs RX 6600 XT

GPU Head-to-Head · FPS & Value Comparison

RX 6700 XT vs RX 6600 XT: Gaming Performance Comparison in 1080p Ultra

In gaming, the RX 6700 XT delivers approximately +6% higher frame rates compared to the RX 6600 XT in 1080p Ultra. For budget-conscious buyers, the RX 6600 XT currently offers +44.1% better value, available at a $115 price difference.

RX 6700 XT Advantages

Up to 6% faster in gaming benchmarks on average – 64 vs 61 FPS

50% more VRAM memory – 12 vs 8 GB

RX 6600 XT Advantages

Up to 44.1% better value for money – $3.62 vs $5.22/FPS

Costs only 66% of the price – $220 vs $335 (34% cheaper)

Is newer – 2021-08-11 vs 2021-03-18

Consumes up to 30% less energy – 160W vs 230W

Performance Analytics

Average FPS across 21 games · all benchmarks use the same test suite

1080p Ultra

Full HD — max settings

AVG FPS
RX 6700 XT
64.3fps(100%)
RX 6600 XT
60.8fps(95%)
WinnerRX 6700 XT
+6% faster
General Explanation of Benchmark Percentages

When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:

"X% of the performance"

This compares the slower card to the faster card.

Formula: (RX 6600 XT FPS ÷ RX 6700 XT FPS) × 100
Example: (60.8 ÷ 64.3) × 100 = 95%
"X% faster"

This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.

Formula: ((RX 6700 XT FPS - RX 6600 XT FPS) ÷ RX 6600 XT FPS) × 100
Example: ((64.3 - 60.8) ÷ 60.8) × 100 = 6%
Why Someone Might Get Confused:

You naturally think: "If RX 6600 XT is only 95% as fast, then RX 6700 XT should be 5% faster" — but that's incorrect.

The "6% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (95% of and 6% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.

1440p Ultra

1440p QHD — max settings

AVG FPS
RX 6700 XT
47.9fps(100%)
RX 6600 XT
37.7fps(79%)
WinnerRX 6700 XT
+27% faster
General Explanation of Benchmark Percentages

When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:

"X% of the performance"

This compares the slower card to the faster card.

Formula: (RX 6600 XT FPS ÷ RX 6700 XT FPS) × 100
Example: (37.7 ÷ 47.9) × 100 = 79%
"X% faster"

This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.

Formula: ((RX 6700 XT FPS - RX 6600 XT FPS) ÷ RX 6600 XT FPS) × 100
Example: ((47.9 - 37.7) ÷ 37.7) × 100 = 27%
Why Someone Might Get Confused:

You naturally think: "If RX 6600 XT is only 79% as fast, then RX 6700 XT should be 21% faster" — but that's incorrect.

The "27% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (79% of and 27% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.

4K Ultra

3840×2160 — max settings

AVG FPS
RX 6700 XT
26.9fps(100%)
RX 6600 XT
19.8fps(74%)
WinnerRX 6700 XT
+36% faster
General Explanation of Benchmark Percentages

When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:

"X% of the performance"

This compares the slower card to the faster card.

Formula: (RX 6600 XT FPS ÷ RX 6700 XT FPS) × 100
Example: (19.8 ÷ 26.9) × 100 = 74%
"X% faster"

This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.

Formula: ((RX 6700 XT FPS - RX 6600 XT FPS) ÷ RX 6600 XT FPS) × 100
Example: ((26.9 - 19.8) ÷ 19.8) × 100 = 36%
Why Someone Might Get Confused:

You naturally think: "If RX 6600 XT is only 74% as fast, then RX 6700 XT should be 26% faster" — but that's incorrect.

The "36% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (74% of and 36% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.

Efficiency Coefficient 1080p Ultra (Higher = Better Value)

Performance delivered per currency unit: FPS/$

RX 6700 XT
0.192 Value69% Efficiency
RX 6600 XT
0.276 Value100% Efficiency