RX 6700 XT vs RX 5700 XT

GPU Head-to-Head · FPS & Value Comparison

RX 6700 XT vs RX 5700 XT: Gaming Performance Comparison in 1080p Ultra

In gaming, the RX 6700 XT delivers approximately +10% higher frame rates compared to the RX 5700 XT in 1080p Ultra. For budget-conscious buyers, the RX 5700 XT currently offers +91.6% better value, available at a $177 price difference.

RX 6700 XT Advantages

Up to 10% faster in gaming benchmarks on average – 64 vs 58 FPS

50% more VRAM memory – 12 vs 8 GB

Is newer – 2021-03-18 vs 2019-07-01

RX 5700 XT Advantages

Up to 91.6% better value for money – $2.72 vs $5.22/FPS

Costs only 47% of the price – $158 vs $335 (53% cheaper)

Consumes up to 2% less energy – 225W vs 230W

Performance Analytics

Average FPS across 21 games · all benchmarks use the same test suite

1080p Ultra

Full HD — max settings

AVG FPS
RX 6700 XT
64.3fps(100%)
RX 5700 XT
58.2fps(91%)
WinnerRX 6700 XT
+10% faster
General Explanation of Benchmark Percentages

When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:

"X% of the performance"

This compares the slower card to the faster card.

Formula: (RX 5700 XT FPS ÷ RX 6700 XT FPS) × 100
Example: (58.2 ÷ 64.3) × 100 = 91%
"X% faster"

This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.

Formula: ((RX 6700 XT FPS - RX 5700 XT FPS) ÷ RX 5700 XT FPS) × 100
Example: ((64.3 - 58.2) ÷ 58.2) × 100 = 10%
Why Someone Might Get Confused:

You naturally think: "If RX 5700 XT is only 91% as fast, then RX 6700 XT should be 9% faster" — but that's incorrect.

The "10% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (91% of and 10% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.

1440p Ultra

1440p QHD — max settings

AVG FPS
RX 6700 XT
47.9fps(100%)
RX 5700 XT
36.7fps(77%)
WinnerRX 6700 XT
+31% faster
General Explanation of Benchmark Percentages

When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:

"X% of the performance"

This compares the slower card to the faster card.

Formula: (RX 5700 XT FPS ÷ RX 6700 XT FPS) × 100
Example: (36.7 ÷ 47.9) × 100 = 77%
"X% faster"

This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.

Formula: ((RX 6700 XT FPS - RX 5700 XT FPS) ÷ RX 5700 XT FPS) × 100
Example: ((47.9 - 36.7) ÷ 36.7) × 100 = 31%
Why Someone Might Get Confused:

You naturally think: "If RX 5700 XT is only 77% as fast, then RX 6700 XT should be 23% faster" — but that's incorrect.

The "31% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (77% of and 31% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.

4K Ultra

3840×2160 — max settings

AVG FPS
RX 6700 XT
26.9fps(100%)
RX 5700 XT
20.7fps(77%)
WinnerRX 6700 XT
+30% faster
General Explanation of Benchmark Percentages

When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:

"X% of the performance"

This compares the slower card to the faster card.

Formula: (RX 5700 XT FPS ÷ RX 6700 XT FPS) × 100
Example: (20.7 ÷ 26.9) × 100 = 77%
"X% faster"

This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.

Formula: ((RX 6700 XT FPS - RX 5700 XT FPS) ÷ RX 5700 XT FPS) × 100
Example: ((26.9 - 20.7) ÷ 20.7) × 100 = 30%
Why Someone Might Get Confused:

You naturally think: "If RX 5700 XT is only 77% as fast, then RX 6700 XT should be 23% faster" — but that's incorrect.

The "30% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (77% of and 30% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.

Efficiency Coefficient 1080p Ultra (Higher = Better Value)

Performance delivered per currency unit: FPS/$

RX 6700 XT
0.192 Value52% Efficiency
RX 5700 XT
0.367 Value100% Efficiency