RX 6650 XT vs A770 16GB
GPU Head-to-Head · FPS & Value Comparison
RX 6650 XT vs A770 16GB: Gaming Performance Comparison in 1080p Ultra
In gaming, the RX 6650 XT delivers approximately +1% higher frame rates compared to the A770 16GB in 1080p Ultra. For budget-conscious buyers, the RX 6650 XT currently offers +51.6% better value, available at a $113 price difference.
RX 6650 XT Advantages
Up to 1% faster in gaming benchmarks on average – 54 vs 53 FPS
Up to 51.6% better value for money – $4.28 vs $6.48/FPS
Costs only 67% of the price – $229 vs $342 (33% cheaper)
Consumes up to 20% less energy – 180W vs 225W
A770 16GB Advantages
100% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 8 GB
Is newer – 2022-10-01 vs 2022-05-01
Performance Analytics
Average FPS across 21 games · all benchmarks use the same test suite
1080p Ultra
Full HD — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (52.8 ÷ 53.5) × 100 = 99%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((53.5 - 52.8) ÷ 52.8) × 100 = 1%
You naturally think: "If A770 16GB is only 99% as fast, then RX 6650 XT should be 1% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "1% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (99% of and 1% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
1440p Ultra
1440p QHD — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (36.5 ÷ 39.8) × 100 = 92%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((39.8 - 36.5) ÷ 36.5) × 100 = 9%
You naturally think: "If A770 16GB is only 92% as fast, then RX 6650 XT should be 8% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "9% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (92% of and 9% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
4K Ultra
3840×2160 — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (20.9 ÷ 22.3) × 100 = 94%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((22.3 - 20.9) ÷ 20.9) × 100 = 7%
You naturally think: "If RX 6650 XT is only 94% as fast, then A770 16GB should be 6% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "7% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (94% of and 7% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
Efficiency Coefficient 1080p Ultra (Higher = Better Value)
Performance delivered per currency unit: FPS/$