RX 6600 XT vs RX 7600 XT

GPU Head-to-Head · FPS & Value Comparison

RX 6600 XT vs RX 7600 XT: Gaming Performance Comparison in 1080p Ultra

In gaming, the RX 6600 XT delivers approximately +2% higher frame rates compared to the RX 7600 XT in 1080p Ultra. For budget-conscious buyers, the RX 6600 XT currently offers +75.0% better value, available at a $157 price difference.

RX 6600 XT Advantages

Up to 2% faster in gaming benchmarks on average – 61 vs 60 FPS

Up to 75.0% better value for money – $3.62 vs $6.33/FPS

Costs only 58% of the price – $220 vs $377 (42% cheaper)

Consumes up to 16% less energy – 160W vs 190W

RX 7600 XT Advantages

100% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 8 GB

Is newer – 2024-01-24 vs 2021-08-11

Performance Analytics

Average FPS across 21 games · all benchmarks use the same test suite

1080p Ultra

Full HD — max settings

AVG FPS
RX 6600 XT
60.8fps(100%)
RX 7600 XT
59.6fps(98%)
WinnerRX 6600 XT
+2% faster
General Explanation of Benchmark Percentages

When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:

"X% of the performance"

This compares the slower card to the faster card.

Formula: (RX 7600 XT FPS ÷ RX 6600 XT FPS) × 100
Example: (59.6 ÷ 60.8) × 100 = 98%
"X% faster"

This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.

Formula: ((RX 6600 XT FPS - RX 7600 XT FPS) ÷ RX 7600 XT FPS) × 100
Example: ((60.8 - 59.6) ÷ 59.6) × 100 = 2%
Why Someone Might Get Confused:

You naturally think: "If RX 7600 XT is only 98% as fast, then RX 6600 XT should be 2% faster" — but that's incorrect.

The "2% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (98% of and 2% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.

1440p Ultra

1440p QHD — max settings

AVG FPS
RX 6600 XT
37.7fps(91%)
RX 7600 XT
41.4fps(100%)
WinnerRX 7600 XT
+10% faster
General Explanation of Benchmark Percentages

When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:

"X% of the performance"

This compares the slower card to the faster card.

Formula: (RX 6600 XT FPS ÷ RX 7600 XT FPS) × 100
Example: (37.7 ÷ 41.4) × 100 = 91%
"X% faster"

This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.

Formula: ((RX 7600 XT FPS - RX 6600 XT FPS) ÷ RX 6600 XT FPS) × 100
Example: ((41.4 - 37.7) ÷ 37.7) × 100 = 10%
Why Someone Might Get Confused:

You naturally think: "If RX 6600 XT is only 91% as fast, then RX 7600 XT should be 9% faster" — but that's incorrect.

The "10% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (91% of and 10% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.

4K Ultra

3840×2160 — max settings

AVG FPS
RX 6600 XT
19.8fps(87%)
RX 7600 XT
22.7fps(100%)
WinnerRX 7600 XT
+15% faster
General Explanation of Benchmark Percentages

When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:

"X% of the performance"

This compares the slower card to the faster card.

Formula: (RX 6600 XT FPS ÷ RX 7600 XT FPS) × 100
Example: (19.8 ÷ 22.7) × 100 = 87%
"X% faster"

This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.

Formula: ((RX 7600 XT FPS - RX 6600 XT FPS) ÷ RX 6600 XT FPS) × 100
Example: ((22.7 - 19.8) ÷ 19.8) × 100 = 15%
Why Someone Might Get Confused:

You naturally think: "If RX 6600 XT is only 87% as fast, then RX 7600 XT should be 13% faster" — but that's incorrect.

The "15% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (87% of and 15% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.

Efficiency Coefficient 1080p Ultra (Higher = Better Value)

Performance delivered per currency unit: FPS/$

RX 6600 XT
0.276 Value100% Efficiency
RX 7600 XT
0.158 Value57% Efficiency