RX 6600 XT vs RX 5700 XT

GPU Head-to-Head · FPS & Value Comparison

RX 6600 XT vs RX 5700 XT: Gaming Performance Comparison in 1080p Ultra

In gaming, the RX 6600 XT delivers approximately +4% higher frame rates compared to the RX 5700 XT in 1080p Ultra (both featuring 8GB VRAM). For budget-conscious buyers, the RX 5700 XT currently offers +32.9% better value, available at a $61.57 price difference.

RX 6600 XT Advantages

Up to 4% faster in gaming benchmarks on average – 61 vs 58 FPS

Is newer – 2021-08-11 vs 2019-07-01

Consumes up to 29% less energy – 160W vs 225W

RX 5700 XT Advantages

Up to 32.9% better value for money – $2.72 vs $3.62/FPS

Costs only 72% of the price – $158 vs $220 (28% cheaper)

Performance Analytics

Average FPS across 21 games · all benchmarks use the same test suite

1080p Ultra

Full HD — max settings

AVG FPS
RX 6600 XT
60.8fps(100%)
RX 5700 XT
58.2fps(96%)
WinnerRX 6600 XT
+4% faster
General Explanation of Benchmark Percentages

When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:

"X% of the performance"

This compares the slower card to the faster card.

Formula: (RX 5700 XT FPS ÷ RX 6600 XT FPS) × 100
Example: (58.2 ÷ 60.8) × 100 = 96%
"X% faster"

This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.

Formula: ((RX 6600 XT FPS - RX 5700 XT FPS) ÷ RX 5700 XT FPS) × 100
Example: ((60.8 - 58.2) ÷ 58.2) × 100 = 4%
Why Someone Might Get Confused:

You naturally think: "If RX 5700 XT is only 96% as fast, then RX 6600 XT should be 4% faster" — but that's incorrect.

The "4% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (96% of and 4% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.

1440p Ultra

1440p QHD — max settings

AVG FPS
RX 6600 XT
37.7fps(100%)
RX 5700 XT
36.7fps(97%)
WinnerRX 6600 XT
+3% faster
General Explanation of Benchmark Percentages

When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:

"X% of the performance"

This compares the slower card to the faster card.

Formula: (RX 5700 XT FPS ÷ RX 6600 XT FPS) × 100
Example: (36.7 ÷ 37.7) × 100 = 97%
"X% faster"

This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.

Formula: ((RX 6600 XT FPS - RX 5700 XT FPS) ÷ RX 5700 XT FPS) × 100
Example: ((37.7 - 36.7) ÷ 36.7) × 100 = 3%
Why Someone Might Get Confused:

You naturally think: "If RX 5700 XT is only 97% as fast, then RX 6600 XT should be 3% faster" — but that's incorrect.

The "3% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (97% of and 3% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.

4K Ultra

3840×2160 — max settings

AVG FPS
RX 6600 XT
19.8fps(96%)
RX 5700 XT
20.7fps(100%)
WinnerRX 5700 XT
+5% faster
General Explanation of Benchmark Percentages

When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:

"X% of the performance"

This compares the slower card to the faster card.

Formula: (RX 6600 XT FPS ÷ RX 5700 XT FPS) × 100
Example: (19.8 ÷ 20.7) × 100 = 96%
"X% faster"

This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.

Formula: ((RX 5700 XT FPS - RX 6600 XT FPS) ÷ RX 6600 XT FPS) × 100
Example: ((20.7 - 19.8) ÷ 19.8) × 100 = 5%
Why Someone Might Get Confused:

You naturally think: "If RX 6600 XT is only 96% as fast, then RX 5700 XT should be 4% faster" — but that's incorrect.

The "5% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (96% of and 5% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.

Efficiency Coefficient 1080p Ultra (Higher = Better Value)

Performance delivered per currency unit: FPS/$

RX 6600 XT
0.276 Value75% Efficiency
RX 5700 XT
0.367 Value100% Efficiency