RX 6600 XT vs RTX 5050
GPU Head-to-Head · FPS & Value Comparison
RX 6600 XT vs RTX 5050: Gaming Performance Comparison in 1080p Ultra
In gaming, the RX 6600 XT delivers approximately +9% higher frame rates compared to the RTX 5050 in 1080p Ultra (both featuring 8GB VRAM). For budget-conscious buyers, the RX 6600 XT currently offers +49.9% better value, available at a $83.14 price difference.
RX 6600 XT Advantages
Up to 9% faster in gaming benchmarks on average – 61 vs 56 FPS
Up to 49.9% better value for money – $3.62 vs $5.42/FPS
Costs only 73% of the price – $220 vs $303 (27% cheaper)
RTX 5050 Advantages
Is newer – 2025-07-01 vs 2021-08-11
Consumes up to 19% less energy – 130W vs 160W
Performance Analytics
Average FPS across 21 games · all benchmarks use the same test suite
1080p Ultra
Full HD — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (55.9 ÷ 60.8) × 100 = 92%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((60.8 - 55.9) ÷ 55.9) × 100 = 9%
You naturally think: "If RTX 5050 is only 92% as fast, then RX 6600 XT should be 8% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "9% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (92% of and 9% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
1440p Ultra
1440p QHD — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (35.1 ÷ 37.7) × 100 = 93%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((37.7 - 35.1) ÷ 35.1) × 100 = 7%
You naturally think: "If RTX 5050 is only 93% as fast, then RX 6600 XT should be 7% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "7% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (93% of and 7% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
4K Ultra
3840×2160 — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (16.5 ÷ 19.8) × 100 = 83%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((19.8 - 16.5) ÷ 16.5) × 100 = 20%
You naturally think: "If RTX 5050 is only 83% as fast, then RX 6600 XT should be 17% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "20% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (83% of and 20% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
Efficiency Coefficient 1080p Ultra (Higher = Better Value)
Performance delivered per currency unit: FPS/$