RX 6500 XT vs RX 6400
GPU Head-to-Head · FPS & Value Comparison
RX 6500 XT vs RX 6400: Gaming Performance Comparison in 1080p Ultra
In gaming, the RX 6500 XT delivers approximately +30% higher frame rates compared to the RX 6400 in 1080p Ultra (both featuring 4GB VRAM). For budget-conscious buyers, the RX 6500 XT currently offers +58.2% better value, available at a $25.57 price difference.
RX 6500 XT Advantages
Up to 30% faster in gaming benchmarks on average – 28 vs 22 FPS
Up to 58.2% better value for money – $4.18 vs $6.61/FPS
Costs only 82% of the price – $118 vs $143 (18% cheaper)
RX 6400 Advantages
Is newer – 2022-04-01 vs 2022-01-01
Consumes up to 50% less energy – 53W vs 107W
Performance Analytics
Average FPS across 21 games · all benchmarks use the same test suite
1080p Ultra
Full HD — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (21.7 ÷ 28.2) × 100 = 77%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((28.2 - 21.7) ÷ 21.7) × 100 = 30%
You naturally think: "If RX 6400 is only 77% as fast, then RX 6500 XT should be 23% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "30% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (77% of and 30% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
1440p Ultra
1440p QHD — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (12.6 ÷ 16) × 100 = 79%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((16 - 12.6) ÷ 12.6) × 100 = 27%
You naturally think: "If RX 6400 is only 79% as fast, then RX 6500 XT should be 21% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "27% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (79% of and 27% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
4K Ultra
3840×2160 — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (6.3 ÷ 7.6) × 100 = 83%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((7.6 - 6.3) ÷ 6.3) × 100 = 21%
You naturally think: "If RX 6400 is only 83% as fast, then RX 6500 XT should be 17% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "21% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (83% of and 21% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
Efficiency Coefficient 1080p Ultra (Higher = Better Value)
Performance delivered per currency unit: FPS/$