RX 5700 XT vs RX 6650 XT

GPU Head-to-Head · FPS & Value Comparison

RX 5700 XT vs RX 6650 XT: Gaming Performance Comparison in 1080p Ultra

In gaming, the RX 5700 XT delivers approximately +9% higher frame rates compared to the RX 6650 XT in 1080p Ultra (both featuring 8GB VRAM). For budget-conscious buyers, the RX 5700 XT currently offers +53.8% better value, available at a $65.60 price difference.

RX 5700 XT Advantages

Up to 9% faster in gaming benchmarks on average – 58 vs 54 FPS

Up to 53.8% better value for money – $2.72 vs $4.19/FPS

Costs only 71% of the price – $158 vs $224 (29% cheaper)

RX 6650 XT Advantages

Is newer – 2022-05-01 vs 2019-07-01

Consumes up to 20% less energy – 180W vs 225W

Performance Analytics

Average FPS across 21 games · all benchmarks use the same test suite

1080p Ultra

Full HD — max settings

AVG FPS
RX 5700 XT
58.2fps(100%)
RX 6650 XT
53.5fps(92%)
WinnerRX 5700 XT
+9% faster
General Explanation of Benchmark Percentages

When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:

"X% of the performance"

This compares the slower card to the faster card.

Formula: (RX 6650 XT FPS ÷ RX 5700 XT FPS) × 100
Example: (53.5 ÷ 58.2) × 100 = 92%
"X% faster"

This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.

Formula: ((RX 5700 XT FPS - RX 6650 XT FPS) ÷ RX 6650 XT FPS) × 100
Example: ((58.2 - 53.5) ÷ 53.5) × 100 = 9%
Why Someone Might Get Confused:

You naturally think: "If RX 6650 XT is only 92% as fast, then RX 5700 XT should be 8% faster" — but that's incorrect.

The "9% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (92% of and 9% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.

1440p Ultra

1440p QHD — max settings

AVG FPS
RX 5700 XT
36.7fps(92%)
RX 6650 XT
39.8fps(100%)
WinnerRX 6650 XT
+8% faster
General Explanation of Benchmark Percentages

When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:

"X% of the performance"

This compares the slower card to the faster card.

Formula: (RX 5700 XT FPS ÷ RX 6650 XT FPS) × 100
Example: (36.7 ÷ 39.8) × 100 = 92%
"X% faster"

This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.

Formula: ((RX 6650 XT FPS - RX 5700 XT FPS) ÷ RX 5700 XT FPS) × 100
Example: ((39.8 - 36.7) ÷ 36.7) × 100 = 8%
Why Someone Might Get Confused:

You naturally think: "If RX 5700 XT is only 92% as fast, then RX 6650 XT should be 8% faster" — but that's incorrect.

The "8% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (92% of and 8% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.

4K Ultra

3840×2160 — max settings

AVG FPS
RX 5700 XT
20.7fps(99%)
RX 6650 XT
20.9fps(100%)
WinnerRX 6650 XT
+1% faster
General Explanation of Benchmark Percentages

When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:

"X% of the performance"

This compares the slower card to the faster card.

Formula: (RX 5700 XT FPS ÷ RX 6650 XT FPS) × 100
Example: (20.7 ÷ 20.9) × 100 = 99%
"X% faster"

This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.

Formula: ((RX 6650 XT FPS - RX 5700 XT FPS) ÷ RX 5700 XT FPS) × 100
Example: ((20.9 - 20.7) ÷ 20.7) × 100 = 1%
Why Someone Might Get Confused:

You naturally think: "If RX 5700 XT is only 99% as fast, then RX 6650 XT should be 1% faster" — but that's incorrect.

The "1% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (99% of and 1% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.

Efficiency Coefficient 1080p Ultra (Higher = Better Value)

Performance delivered per currency unit: FPS/$

RX 5700 XT
0.367 Value100% Efficiency
RX 6650 XT
0.239 Value65% Efficiency