RTX 5090 vs RX 7900 XTX
GPU Head-to-Head · FPS & Value Comparison
RTX 5090 vs RX 7900 XTX: Gaming Performance Comparison in 1080p Ultra
In gaming, the RTX 5090 delivers approximately +26% higher frame rates compared to the RX 7900 XTX in 1080p Ultra. For budget-conscious buyers, the RX 7900 XTX currently offers +273.6% better value, available at a $3,024 price difference.
RTX 5090 Advantages
Up to 26% faster in gaming benchmarks on average – 177 vs 141 FPS
33% more VRAM memory – 32 vs 24 GB
Is newer – 2025-01-30 vs 2022-12-13
RX 7900 XTX Advantages
Up to 273.6% better value for money – $5.80 vs $21.67/FPS
Costs only 21% of the price – $816 vs $3,840 (79% cheaper)
Consumes up to 38% less energy – 355W vs 575W
Performance Analytics
Average FPS across 21 games · all benchmarks use the same test suite
1080p Medium
Entry / competitive gaming
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (174.1 ÷ 197.5) × 100 = 88%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((197.5 - 174.1) ÷ 174.1) × 100 = 13%
You naturally think: "If RX 7900 XTX is only 88% as fast, then RTX 5090 should be 12% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "13% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (88% of and 13% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
1080p Ultra
Full HD — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (140.7 ÷ 177.2) × 100 = 79%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((177.2 - 140.7) ÷ 140.7) × 100 = 26%
You naturally think: "If RX 7900 XTX is only 79% as fast, then RTX 5090 should be 21% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "26% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (79% of and 26% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
1440p Ultra
1440p QHD — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (101.9 ÷ 142) × 100 = 72%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((142 - 101.9) ÷ 101.9) × 100 = 39%
You naturally think: "If RX 7900 XTX is only 72% as fast, then RTX 5090 should be 28% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "39% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (72% of and 39% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
4K Ultra
3840×2160 — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (64.5 ÷ 106.1) × 100 = 61%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((106.1 - 64.5) ÷ 64.5) × 100 = 64%
You naturally think: "If RX 7900 XTX is only 61% as fast, then RTX 5090 should be 39% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "64% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (61% of and 64% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
Efficiency Coefficient 1080p Ultra (Higher = Better Value)
Performance delivered per currency unit: FPS/$