RTX 5090 vs RTX 4080
GPU Head-to-Head · FPS & Value Comparison
RTX 5090 vs RTX 4080: Gaming Performance Comparison in 1080p Ultra
In gaming, the RTX 5090 delivers approximately +22% higher frame rates compared to the RTX 4080 in 1080p Ultra. For budget-conscious buyers, the RTX 4080 currently offers +237.7% better value, available at a $2,907 price difference.
RTX 5090 Advantages
Up to 22% faster in gaming benchmarks on average – 177 vs 145 FPS
100% more VRAM memory – 32 vs 16 GB
Is newer – 2025-01-30 vs 2022-11-16
RTX 4080 Advantages
Up to 237.7% better value for money – $6.42 vs $21.67/FPS
Costs only 24% of the price – $933 vs $3,840 (76% cheaper)
Consumes up to 44% less energy – 320W vs 575W
Performance Analytics
Average FPS across 21 games · all benchmarks use the same test suite
1080p Medium
Entry / competitive gaming
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (175 ÷ 197.5) × 100 = 89%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((197.5 - 175) ÷ 175) × 100 = 13%
You naturally think: "If RTX 4080 is only 89% as fast, then RTX 5090 should be 11% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "13% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (89% of and 13% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
1080p Ultra
Full HD — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (145.4 ÷ 177.2) × 100 = 82%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((177.2 - 145.4) ÷ 145.4) × 100 = 22%
You naturally think: "If RTX 4080 is only 82% as fast, then RTX 5090 should be 18% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "22% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (82% of and 22% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
1440p Ultra
1440p QHD — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (103 ÷ 142) × 100 = 73%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((142 - 103) ÷ 103) × 100 = 38%
You naturally think: "If RTX 4080 is only 73% as fast, then RTX 5090 should be 27% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "38% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (73% of and 38% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
4K Ultra
3840×2160 — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (63 ÷ 106.1) × 100 = 59%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((106.1 - 63) ÷ 63) × 100 = 68%
You naturally think: "If RTX 4080 is only 59% as fast, then RTX 5090 should be 41% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "68% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (59% of and 68% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
Efficiency Coefficient 1080p Ultra (Higher = Better Value)
Performance delivered per currency unit: FPS/$