RTX 5070 Ti vs RX 9070
GPU Head-to-Head · FPS & Value Comparison
RTX 5070 Ti vs RX 9070: Gaming Performance Comparison in 1080p Ultra
In gaming, the RTX 5070 Ti delivers approximately +13% higher frame rates compared to the RX 9070 in 1080p Ultra (both featuring 16GB VRAM). For budget-conscious buyers, the RX 9070 currently offers +34.3% better value, available at a $320 price difference.
RTX 5070 Ti Advantages
Up to 13% faster in gaming benchmarks on average – 140 vs 124 FPS
RX 9070 Advantages
Up to 34.3% better value for money – $5.03 vs $6.75/FPS
Costs only 66% of the price – $624 vs $943 (34% cheaper)
Is newer – 2025-03-06 vs 2025-02-20
Consumes up to 27% less energy – 220W vs 300W
Performance Analytics
Average FPS across 21 games · all benchmarks use the same test suite
1080p Medium
Entry / competitive gaming
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (159.1 ÷ 169.3) × 100 = 94%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((169.3 - 159.1) ÷ 159.1) × 100 = 6%
You naturally think: "If RX 9070 is only 94% as fast, then RTX 5070 Ti should be 6% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "6% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (94% of and 6% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
1080p Ultra
Full HD — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (124.1 ÷ 139.7) × 100 = 89%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((139.7 - 124.1) ÷ 124.1) × 100 = 13%
You naturally think: "If RX 9070 is only 89% as fast, then RTX 5070 Ti should be 11% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "13% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (89% of and 13% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
1440p Ultra
1440p QHD — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (86.3 ÷ 100.5) × 100 = 86%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((100.5 - 86.3) ÷ 86.3) × 100 = 16%
You naturally think: "If RX 9070 is only 86% as fast, then RTX 5070 Ti should be 14% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "16% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (86% of and 16% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
4K Ultra
3840×2160 — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (53.1 ÷ 62.3) × 100 = 85%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((62.3 - 53.1) ÷ 53.1) × 100 = 17%
You naturally think: "If RX 9070 is only 85% as fast, then RTX 5070 Ti should be 15% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "17% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (85% of and 17% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
Efficiency Coefficient 1080p Ultra (Higher = Better Value)
Performance delivered per currency unit: FPS/$