RTX 5060 Ti 16GB vs RX 9060 XT 16GB
GPU Head-to-Head · FPS & Value Comparison
RTX 5060 Ti 16GB vs RX 9060 XT 16GB: Gaming Performance Comparison in 1080p Ultra
In gaming, the RTX 5060 Ti 16GB delivers approximately +5% higher frame rates compared to the RX 9060 XT 16GB in 1080p Ultra (both featuring 16GB VRAM). For budget-conscious buyers, the RX 9060 XT 16GB currently offers +20.6% better value, available at a $122 price difference.
RTX 5060 Ti 16GB Advantages
Up to 5% faster in gaming benchmarks on average – 95 vs 90 FPS
RX 9060 XT 16GB Advantages
Up to 20.6% better value for money – $5.07 vs $6.11/FPS
Costs only 79% of the price – $457 vs $580 (21% cheaper)
Is newer – 2025-05-21 vs 2025-04-16
Consumes up to 11% less energy – 160W vs 180W
Performance Analytics
Average FPS across 21 games · all benchmarks use the same test suite
1080p Medium
Entry / competitive gaming
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (117.7 ÷ 120.3) × 100 = 98%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((120.3 - 117.7) ÷ 117.7) × 100 = 2%
You naturally think: "If RX 9060 XT 16GB is only 98% as fast, then RTX 5060 Ti 16GB should be 2% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "2% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (98% of and 2% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
1080p Ultra
Full HD — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (90.3 ÷ 94.9) × 100 = 95%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((94.9 - 90.3) ÷ 90.3) × 100 = 5%
You naturally think: "If RX 9060 XT 16GB is only 95% as fast, then RTX 5060 Ti 16GB should be 5% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "5% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (95% of and 5% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
1440p Ultra
1440p QHD — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (59 ÷ 61.9) × 100 = 95%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((61.9 - 59) ÷ 59) × 100 = 5%
You naturally think: "If RX 9060 XT 16GB is only 95% as fast, then RTX 5060 Ti 16GB should be 5% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "5% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (95% of and 5% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
4K Ultra
3840×2160 — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (33.9 ÷ 35.7) × 100 = 95%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((35.7 - 33.9) ÷ 33.9) × 100 = 5%
You naturally think: "If RX 9060 XT 16GB is only 95% as fast, then RTX 5060 Ti 16GB should be 5% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "5% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (95% of and 5% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
Efficiency Coefficient 1080p Ultra (Higher = Better Value)
Performance delivered per currency unit: FPS/$