RTX 5050 vs A770 16GB
GPU Head-to-Head · FPS & Value Comparison
RTX 5050 vs A770 16GB: Gaming Performance Comparison in 1080p Ultra
In gaming, the RTX 5050 delivers approximately +6% higher frame rates compared to the A770 16GB in 1080p Ultra. For budget-conscious buyers, the RTX 5050 currently offers +18.3% better value, available at a $35.88 price difference.
RTX 5050 Advantages
Up to 6% faster in gaming benchmarks on average – 56 vs 53 FPS
Up to 18.3% better value for money – $5.48 vs $6.48/FPS
Costs only 90% of the price – $306 vs $342 (10% cheaper)
Is newer – 2025-07-01 vs 2022-10-01
A770 16GB Advantages
100% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 8 GB
Performance Analytics
Average FPS across 21 games · all benchmarks use the same test suite
1080p Medium
Entry / competitive gaming
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (63.4 ÷ 79.6) × 100 = 80%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((79.6 - 63.4) ÷ 63.4) × 100 = 26%
You naturally think: "If A770 16GB is only 80% as fast, then RTX 5050 should be 20% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "26% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (80% of and 26% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
1080p Ultra
Full HD — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (52.8 ÷ 55.9) × 100 = 94%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((55.9 - 52.8) ÷ 52.8) × 100 = 6%
You naturally think: "If A770 16GB is only 94% as fast, then RTX 5050 should be 6% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "6% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (94% of and 6% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
1440p Ultra
1440p QHD — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (35.1 ÷ 36.5) × 100 = 96%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((36.5 - 35.1) ÷ 35.1) × 100 = 4%
You naturally think: "If RTX 5050 is only 96% as fast, then A770 16GB should be 4% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "4% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (96% of and 4% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
4K Ultra
3840×2160 — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (16.5 ÷ 22.3) × 100 = 74%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((22.3 - 16.5) ÷ 16.5) × 100 = 35%
You naturally think: "If RTX 5050 is only 74% as fast, then A770 16GB should be 26% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "35% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (74% of and 35% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
Efficiency Coefficient 1080p Ultra (Higher = Better Value)
Performance delivered per currency unit: FPS/$