RTX 4090 vs RTX 5080
GPU Head-to-Head · FPS & Value Comparison
RTX 4090 vs RTX 5080: Gaming Performance Comparison in 1080p Ultra
In gaming, the RTX 4090 delivers approximately +12% higher frame rates compared to the RTX 5080 in 1080p Ultra. For budget-conscious buyers, the RTX 5080 currently offers +70.8% better value, available at a $1,167 price difference.
RTX 4090 Advantages
Up to 12% faster in gaming benchmarks on average – 169 vs 151 FPS
50% more VRAM memory – 24 vs 16 GB
RTX 5080 Advantages
Up to 70.8% better value for money – $8.47 vs $14.48/FPS
Costs only 52% of the price – $1,276 vs $2,443 (48% cheaper)
Is newer – 2025-01-30 vs 2022-10-12
Consumes up to 20% less energy – 360W vs 450W
Performance Analytics
Average FPS across 21 games · all benchmarks use the same test suite
1080p Medium
Entry / competitive gaming
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (178.5 ÷ 195.6) × 100 = 91%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((195.6 - 178.5) ÷ 178.5) × 100 = 10%
You naturally think: "If RTX 5080 is only 91% as fast, then RTX 4090 should be 9% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "10% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (91% of and 10% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
1080p Ultra
Full HD — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (150.6 ÷ 168.8) × 100 = 89%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((168.8 - 150.6) ÷ 150.6) × 100 = 12%
You naturally think: "If RTX 5080 is only 89% as fast, then RTX 4090 should be 11% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "12% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (89% of and 12% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
1440p Ultra
1440p QHD — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (110.9 ÷ 125.7) × 100 = 88%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((125.7 - 110.9) ÷ 110.9) × 100 = 13%
You naturally think: "If RTX 5080 is only 88% as fast, then RTX 4090 should be 12% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "13% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (88% of and 13% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
4K Ultra
3840×2160 — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (71.3 ÷ 85.2) × 100 = 84%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((85.2 - 71.3) ÷ 71.3) × 100 = 19%
You naturally think: "If RTX 5080 is only 84% as fast, then RTX 4090 should be 16% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "19% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (84% of and 19% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
Efficiency Coefficient 1080p Ultra (Higher = Better Value)
Performance delivered per currency unit: FPS/$