RTX 4090 vs RTX 5070 Ti
GPU Head-to-Head · FPS & Value Comparison
RTX 4090 vs RTX 5070 Ti: Gaming Performance Comparison in 1080p Ultra
In gaming, the RTX 4090 delivers approximately +21% higher frame rates compared to the RTX 5070 Ti in 1080p Ultra. For budget-conscious buyers, the RTX 5070 Ti currently offers +114.4% better value, available at a $1,500 price difference.
RTX 4090 Advantages
Up to 21% faster in gaming benchmarks on average – 169 vs 140 FPS
50% more VRAM memory – 24 vs 16 GB
RTX 5070 Ti Advantages
Up to 114.4% better value for money – $6.75 vs $14.48/FPS
Costs only 39% of the price – $943 vs $2,443 (61% cheaper)
Is newer – 2025-02-20 vs 2022-10-12
Consumes up to 33% less energy – 300W vs 450W
Performance Analytics
Average FPS across 21 games · all benchmarks use the same test suite
1080p Medium
Entry / competitive gaming
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (169.3 ÷ 195.6) × 100 = 87%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((195.6 - 169.3) ÷ 169.3) × 100 = 16%
You naturally think: "If RTX 5070 Ti is only 87% as fast, then RTX 4090 should be 13% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "16% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (87% of and 16% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
1080p Ultra
Full HD — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (139.7 ÷ 168.8) × 100 = 83%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((168.8 - 139.7) ÷ 139.7) × 100 = 21%
You naturally think: "If RTX 5070 Ti is only 83% as fast, then RTX 4090 should be 17% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "21% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (83% of and 21% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
1440p Ultra
1440p QHD — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (100.5 ÷ 125.7) × 100 = 80%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((125.7 - 100.5) ÷ 100.5) × 100 = 25%
You naturally think: "If RTX 5070 Ti is only 80% as fast, then RTX 4090 should be 20% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "25% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (80% of and 25% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
4K Ultra
3840×2160 — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (62.3 ÷ 85.2) × 100 = 73%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((85.2 - 62.3) ÷ 62.3) × 100 = 37%
You naturally think: "If RTX 5070 Ti is only 73% as fast, then RTX 4090 should be 27% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "37% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (73% of and 37% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
Efficiency Coefficient 1080p Ultra (Higher = Better Value)
Performance delivered per currency unit: FPS/$