RTX 4070 vs RX 9060 XT 16GB
GPU Head-to-Head · FPS & Value Comparison
RTX 4070 vs RX 9060 XT 16GB: Gaming Performance Comparison in 1080p Ultra
In gaming, the RTX 4070 delivers approximately +5% higher frame rates compared to the RX 9060 XT 16GB in 1080p Ultra. For budget-conscious buyers, the RX 9060 XT 16GB currently offers +14.6% better value, available at a $91.12 price difference.
RTX 4070 Advantages
Up to 5% faster in gaming benchmarks on average – 95 vs 90 FPS
RX 9060 XT 16GB Advantages
Up to 14.6% better value for money – $5.07 vs $5.80/FPS
Costs only 83% of the price – $457 vs $549 (17% cheaper)
33% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 12 GB
Is newer – 2025-05-21 vs 2023-04-13
Performance Analytics
Average FPS across 21 games · all benchmarks use the same test suite
1080p Medium
Entry / competitive gaming
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (117.7 ÷ 130.7) × 100 = 90%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((130.7 - 117.7) ÷ 117.7) × 100 = 11%
You naturally think: "If RX 9060 XT 16GB is only 90% as fast, then RTX 4070 should be 10% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "11% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (90% of and 11% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
1080p Ultra
Full HD — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (90.3 ÷ 94.5) × 100 = 96%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((94.5 - 90.3) ÷ 90.3) × 100 = 5%
You naturally think: "If RX 9060 XT 16GB is only 96% as fast, then RTX 4070 should be 4% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "5% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (96% of and 5% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
1440p Ultra
1440p QHD — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (59 ÷ 67.8) × 100 = 87%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((67.8 - 59) ÷ 59) × 100 = 15%
You naturally think: "If RX 9060 XT 16GB is only 87% as fast, then RTX 4070 should be 13% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "15% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (87% of and 15% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
4K Ultra
3840×2160 — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (33.9 ÷ 39.4) × 100 = 86%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((39.4 - 33.9) ÷ 33.9) × 100 = 16%
You naturally think: "If RX 9060 XT 16GB is only 86% as fast, then RTX 4070 should be 14% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "16% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (86% of and 16% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
Efficiency Coefficient 1080p Ultra (Higher = Better Value)
Performance delivered per currency unit: FPS/$