RTX 4060 Ti 16GB vs RX 7700 XT
GPU Head-to-Head · FPS & Value Comparison
RTX 4060 Ti 16GB vs RX 7700 XT: Gaming Performance Comparison in 1080p Ultra
In gaming, the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB delivers approximately +1% higher frame rates compared to the RX 7700 XT in 1080p Ultra. For budget-conscious buyers, the RX 7700 XT currently offers +56.4% better value, available at a $233 price difference.
RTX 4060 Ti 16GB Advantages
Up to 1% faster in gaming benchmarks on average – 82 vs 81 FPS
33% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 12 GB
Consumes up to 33% less energy – 165W vs 245W
RX 7700 XT Advantages
Up to 56.4% better value for money – $4.93 vs $7.71/FPS
Costs only 63% of the price – $397 vs $630 (37% cheaper)
Is newer – 2023-09-06 vs 2023-07-18
Performance Analytics
Average FPS across 21 games · all benchmarks use the same test suite
1080p Medium
Entry / competitive gaming
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (103.5 ÷ 114.5) × 100 = 90%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((114.5 - 103.5) ÷ 103.5) × 100 = 11%
You naturally think: "If RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is only 90% as fast, then RX 7700 XT should be 10% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "11% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (90% of and 11% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
1080p Ultra
Full HD — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (80.6 ÷ 81.8) × 100 = 99%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((81.8 - 80.6) ÷ 80.6) × 100 = 1%
You naturally think: "If RX 7700 XT is only 99% as fast, then RTX 4060 Ti 16GB should be 1% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "1% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (99% of and 1% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
1440p Ultra
1440p QHD — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (52.1 ÷ 60.2) × 100 = 87%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((60.2 - 52.1) ÷ 52.1) × 100 = 16%
You naturally think: "If RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is only 87% as fast, then RX 7700 XT should be 13% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "16% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (87% of and 16% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
4K Ultra
3840×2160 — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (29.3 ÷ 34.7) × 100 = 84%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((34.7 - 29.3) ÷ 29.3) × 100 = 18%
You naturally think: "If RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is only 84% as fast, then RX 7700 XT should be 16% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "18% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (84% of and 18% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
Efficiency Coefficient 1080p Ultra (Higher = Better Value)
Performance delivered per currency unit: FPS/$