RTX 4060 Ti 16GB vs RTX 5060

GPU Head-to-Head · FPS & Value Comparison

RTX 4060 Ti 16GB vs RTX 5060: Gaming Performance Comparison in 1080p Ultra

In gaming, the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB delivers approximately +9% higher frame rates compared to the RTX 5060 in 1080p Ultra. For budget-conscious buyers, the RTX 5060 currently offers +75.9% better value, available at a $305 price difference.

RTX 4060 Ti 16GB Advantages

Up to 9% faster in gaming benchmarks on average – 82 vs 75 FPS

100% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 8 GB

RTX 5060 Advantages

Up to 75.9% better value for money – $4.41 vs $7.77/FPS

Costs only 52% of the price – $331 vs $635 (48% cheaper)

Is newer – 2025-05-20 vs 2023-07-18

Consumes up to 12% less energy – 145W vs 165W

Performance Analytics

Average FPS across 21 games · all benchmarks use the same test suite

1080p Medium

Entry / competitive gaming

AVG FPS
RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
103.5fps(100%)
RTX 5060
103.3fps(100%)
WinnerRTX 4060 Ti 16GB

1080p Ultra

Full HD — max settings

AVG FPS
RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
81.8fps(100%)
RTX 5060
74.9fps(92%)
WinnerRTX 4060 Ti 16GB
+9% faster
General Explanation of Benchmark Percentages

When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:

"X% of the performance"

This compares the slower card to the faster card.

Formula: (RTX 5060 FPS ÷ RTX 4060 Ti 16GB FPS) × 100
Example: (74.9 ÷ 81.8) × 100 = 92%
"X% faster"

This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.

Formula: ((RTX 4060 Ti 16GB FPS - RTX 5060 FPS) ÷ RTX 5060 FPS) × 100
Example: ((81.8 - 74.9) ÷ 74.9) × 100 = 9%
Why Someone Might Get Confused:

You naturally think: "If RTX 5060 is only 92% as fast, then RTX 4060 Ti 16GB should be 8% faster" — but that's incorrect.

The "9% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (92% of and 9% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.

1440p Ultra

1440p QHD — max settings

AVG FPS
RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
52.1fps(100%)
RTX 5060
45.4fps(87%)
WinnerRTX 4060 Ti 16GB
+15% faster
General Explanation of Benchmark Percentages

When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:

"X% of the performance"

This compares the slower card to the faster card.

Formula: (RTX 5060 FPS ÷ RTX 4060 Ti 16GB FPS) × 100
Example: (45.4 ÷ 52.1) × 100 = 87%
"X% faster"

This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.

Formula: ((RTX 4060 Ti 16GB FPS - RTX 5060 FPS) ÷ RTX 5060 FPS) × 100
Example: ((52.1 - 45.4) ÷ 45.4) × 100 = 15%
Why Someone Might Get Confused:

You naturally think: "If RTX 5060 is only 87% as fast, then RTX 4060 Ti 16GB should be 13% faster" — but that's incorrect.

The "15% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (87% of and 15% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.

4K Ultra

3840×2160 — max settings

AVG FPS
RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
29.3fps(100%)
RTX 5060
19.9fps(68%)
WinnerRTX 4060 Ti 16GB
+47% faster
General Explanation of Benchmark Percentages

When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:

"X% of the performance"

This compares the slower card to the faster card.

Formula: (RTX 5060 FPS ÷ RTX 4060 Ti 16GB FPS) × 100
Example: (19.9 ÷ 29.3) × 100 = 68%
"X% faster"

This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.

Formula: ((RTX 4060 Ti 16GB FPS - RTX 5060 FPS) ÷ RTX 5060 FPS) × 100
Example: ((29.3 - 19.9) ÷ 19.9) × 100 = 47%
Why Someone Might Get Confused:

You naturally think: "If RTX 5060 is only 68% as fast, then RTX 4060 Ti 16GB should be 32% faster" — but that's incorrect.

The "47% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (68% of and 47% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.

Efficiency Coefficient 1080p Ultra (Higher = Better Value)

Performance delivered per currency unit: FPS/$

RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
0.129 Value57% Efficiency
RTX 5060
0.227 Value100% Efficiency