RTX 3050 6GB vs RX 6500 XT

GPU Head-to-Head · FPS & Value Comparison

RTX 3050 6GB vs RX 6500 XT: Gaming Performance Comparison in 1080p Ultra

In gaming, the RTX 3050 6GB delivers approximately +23% higher frame rates compared to the RX 6500 XT in 1080p Ultra. For budget-conscious buyers, the RX 6500 XT currently offers +33.6% better value, available at a $76.45 price difference.

RTX 3050 6GB Advantages

Up to 23% faster in gaming benchmarks on average – 35 vs 28 FPS

50% more VRAM memory – 6 vs 4 GB

Is newer – 2024-02-02 vs 2022-01-01

Consumes up to 35% less energy – 70W vs 107W

RX 6500 XT Advantages

Up to 33.6% better value for money – $4.18 vs $5.58/FPS

Costs only 61% of the price – $118 vs $194 (39% cheaper)

Performance Analytics

Average FPS across 21 games · all benchmarks use the same test suite

1080p Ultra

Full HD — max settings

AVG FPS
RTX 3050 6GB
34.8fps(100%)
RX 6500 XT
28.2fps(81%)
WinnerRTX 3050 6GB
+23% faster
General Explanation of Benchmark Percentages

When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:

"X% of the performance"

This compares the slower card to the faster card.

Formula: (RX 6500 XT FPS ÷ RTX 3050 6GB FPS) × 100
Example: (28.2 ÷ 34.8) × 100 = 81%
"X% faster"

This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.

Formula: ((RTX 3050 6GB FPS - RX 6500 XT FPS) ÷ RX 6500 XT FPS) × 100
Example: ((34.8 - 28.2) ÷ 28.2) × 100 = 23%
Why Someone Might Get Confused:

You naturally think: "If RX 6500 XT is only 81% as fast, then RTX 3050 6GB should be 19% faster" — but that's incorrect.

The "23% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (81% of and 23% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.

1440p Ultra

1440p QHD — max settings

AVG FPS
RTX 3050 6GB
22.9fps(100%)
RX 6500 XT
16fps(70%)
WinnerRTX 3050 6GB
+43% faster
General Explanation of Benchmark Percentages

When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:

"X% of the performance"

This compares the slower card to the faster card.

Formula: (RX 6500 XT FPS ÷ RTX 3050 6GB FPS) × 100
Example: (16 ÷ 22.9) × 100 = 70%
"X% faster"

This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.

Formula: ((RTX 3050 6GB FPS - RX 6500 XT FPS) ÷ RX 6500 XT FPS) × 100
Example: ((22.9 - 16) ÷ 16) × 100 = 43%
Why Someone Might Get Confused:

You naturally think: "If RX 6500 XT is only 70% as fast, then RTX 3050 6GB should be 30% faster" — but that's incorrect.

The "43% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (70% of and 43% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.

4K Ultra

3840×2160 — max settings

AVG FPS
RTX 3050 6GB
11.2fps(100%)
RX 6500 XT
7.6fps(68%)
WinnerRTX 3050 6GB
+47% faster
General Explanation of Benchmark Percentages

When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:

"X% of the performance"

This compares the slower card to the faster card.

Formula: (RX 6500 XT FPS ÷ RTX 3050 6GB FPS) × 100
Example: (7.6 ÷ 11.2) × 100 = 68%
"X% faster"

This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.

Formula: ((RTX 3050 6GB FPS - RX 6500 XT FPS) ÷ RX 6500 XT FPS) × 100
Example: ((11.2 - 7.6) ÷ 7.6) × 100 = 47%
Why Someone Might Get Confused:

You naturally think: "If RX 6500 XT is only 68% as fast, then RTX 3050 6GB should be 32% faster" — but that's incorrect.

The "47% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (68% of and 47% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.

Efficiency Coefficient 1080p Ultra (Higher = Better Value)

Performance delivered per currency unit: FPS/$

RTX 3050 6GB
0.179 Value75% Efficiency
RX 6500 XT
0.239 Value100% Efficiency