RTX 3050 6GB vs RX 6400

GPU Head-to-Head · FPS & Value Comparison

RTX 3050 6GB vs RX 6400: Gaming Performance Comparison in 1080p Ultra

In gaming, the RTX 3050 6GB delivers approximately +60% higher frame rates compared to the RX 6400 in 1080p Ultra. For budget-conscious buyers, the RTX 3050 6GB currently offers +18.4% better value, available at a $50.88 price difference.

RTX 3050 6GB Advantages

Up to 60% faster in gaming benchmarks on average – 35 vs 22 FPS

Up to 18.4% better value for money – $5.58 vs $6.61/FPS

50% more VRAM memory – 6 vs 4 GB

Is newer – 2024-02-02 vs 2022-04-01

RX 6400 Advantages

Costs only 74% of the price – $143 vs $194 (26% cheaper)

Consumes up to 24% less energy – 53W vs 70W

Performance Analytics

Average FPS across 21 games · all benchmarks use the same test suite

1080p Ultra

Full HD — max settings

AVG FPS
RTX 3050 6GB
34.8fps(100%)
RX 6400
21.7fps(62%)
WinnerRTX 3050 6GB
+60% faster
General Explanation of Benchmark Percentages

When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:

"X% of the performance"

This compares the slower card to the faster card.

Formula: (RX 6400 FPS ÷ RTX 3050 6GB FPS) × 100
Example: (21.7 ÷ 34.8) × 100 = 62%
"X% faster"

This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.

Formula: ((RTX 3050 6GB FPS - RX 6400 FPS) ÷ RX 6400 FPS) × 100
Example: ((34.8 - 21.7) ÷ 21.7) × 100 = 60%
Why Someone Might Get Confused:

You naturally think: "If RX 6400 is only 62% as fast, then RTX 3050 6GB should be 38% faster" — but that's incorrect.

The "60% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (62% of and 60% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.

1440p Ultra

1440p QHD — max settings

AVG FPS
RTX 3050 6GB
22.9fps(100%)
RX 6400
12.6fps(55%)
WinnerRTX 3050 6GB
+82% faster
General Explanation of Benchmark Percentages

When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:

"X% of the performance"

This compares the slower card to the faster card.

Formula: (RX 6400 FPS ÷ RTX 3050 6GB FPS) × 100
Example: (12.6 ÷ 22.9) × 100 = 55%
"X% faster"

This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.

Formula: ((RTX 3050 6GB FPS - RX 6400 FPS) ÷ RX 6400 FPS) × 100
Example: ((22.9 - 12.6) ÷ 12.6) × 100 = 82%
Why Someone Might Get Confused:

You naturally think: "If RX 6400 is only 55% as fast, then RTX 3050 6GB should be 45% faster" — but that's incorrect.

The "82% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (55% of and 82% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.

4K Ultra

3840×2160 — max settings

AVG FPS
RTX 3050 6GB
11.2fps(100%)
RX 6400
6.3fps(56%)
WinnerRTX 3050 6GB
+78% faster
General Explanation of Benchmark Percentages

When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:

"X% of the performance"

This compares the slower card to the faster card.

Formula: (RX 6400 FPS ÷ RTX 3050 6GB FPS) × 100
Example: (6.3 ÷ 11.2) × 100 = 56%
"X% faster"

This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.

Formula: ((RTX 3050 6GB FPS - RX 6400 FPS) ÷ RX 6400 FPS) × 100
Example: ((11.2 - 6.3) ÷ 6.3) × 100 = 78%
Why Someone Might Get Confused:

You naturally think: "If RX 6400 is only 56% as fast, then RTX 3050 6GB should be 44% faster" — but that's incorrect.

The "78% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (56% of and 78% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.

Efficiency Coefficient 1080p Ultra (Higher = Better Value)

Performance delivered per currency unit: FPS/$

RTX 3050 6GB
0.179 Value100% Efficiency
RX 6400
0.151 Value84% Efficiency