RTX 3050 6GB vs RX 5500 XT 4GB
GPU Head-to-Head · FPS & Value Comparison
RTX 3050 6GB vs RX 5500 XT 4GB: Gaming Performance Comparison in 1080p Ultra
In gaming, the RTX 3050 6GB delivers approximately +18% higher frame rates compared to the RX 5500 XT 4GB in 1080p Ultra. For budget-conscious buyers, the RX 5500 XT 4GB currently offers +15.1% better value, available at a $50.75 price difference.
RTX 3050 6GB Advantages
Up to 18% faster in gaming benchmarks on average – 35 vs 30 FPS
50% more VRAM memory – 6 vs 4 GB
Is newer – 2024-02-02 vs 2019-12-01
Consumes up to 46% less energy – 70W vs 130W
RX 5500 XT 4GB Advantages
Up to 15.1% better value for money – $4.85 vs $5.58/FPS
Costs only 74% of the price – $144 vs $194 (26% cheaper)
Performance Analytics
Average FPS across 21 games · all benchmarks use the same test suite
1080p Ultra
Full HD — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (29.6 ÷ 34.8) × 100 = 85%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((34.8 - 29.6) ÷ 29.6) × 100 = 18%
You naturally think: "If RX 5500 XT 4GB is only 85% as fast, then RTX 3050 6GB should be 15% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "18% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (85% of and 18% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
1440p Ultra
1440p QHD — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (17.7 ÷ 22.9) × 100 = 77%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((22.9 - 17.7) ÷ 17.7) × 100 = 29%
You naturally think: "If RX 5500 XT 4GB is only 77% as fast, then RTX 3050 6GB should be 23% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "29% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (77% of and 29% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
4K Ultra
3840×2160 — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (9.8 ÷ 11.2) × 100 = 88%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((11.2 - 9.8) ÷ 9.8) × 100 = 14%
You naturally think: "If RX 5500 XT 4GB is only 88% as fast, then RTX 3050 6GB should be 12% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "14% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (88% of and 14% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
Efficiency Coefficient 1080p Ultra (Higher = Better Value)
Performance delivered per currency unit: FPS/$