RTX 3050 vs RX 6500 XT

GPU Head-to-Head · FPS & Value Comparison

RTX 3050 vs RX 6500 XT: Gaming Performance Comparison in 1080p Ultra

In gaming, the RTX 3050 delivers approximately +34% higher frame rates compared to the RX 6500 XT in 1080p Ultra. For budget-conscious buyers, the RX 6500 XT currently offers +27.2% better value, available at a $82.58 price difference.

RTX 3050 Advantages

Up to 34% faster in gaming benchmarks on average – 38 vs 28 FPS

100% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 4 GB

Is newer – 2022-01-27 vs 2022-01-01

RX 6500 XT Advantages

Up to 27.2% better value for money – $4.18 vs $5.32/FPS

Costs only 59% of the price – $118 vs $200 (41% cheaper)

Consumes up to 18% less energy – 107W vs 130W

Performance Analytics

Average FPS across 21 games · all benchmarks use the same test suite

1080p Ultra

Full HD — max settings

AVG FPS
RTX 3050
37.7fps(100%)
RX 6500 XT
28.2fps(75%)
WinnerRTX 3050
+34% faster
General Explanation of Benchmark Percentages

When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:

"X% of the performance"

This compares the slower card to the faster card.

Formula: (RX 6500 XT FPS ÷ RTX 3050 FPS) × 100
Example: (28.2 ÷ 37.7) × 100 = 75%
"X% faster"

This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.

Formula: ((RTX 3050 FPS - RX 6500 XT FPS) ÷ RX 6500 XT FPS) × 100
Example: ((37.7 - 28.2) ÷ 28.2) × 100 = 34%
Why Someone Might Get Confused:

You naturally think: "If RX 6500 XT is only 75% as fast, then RTX 3050 should be 25% faster" — but that's incorrect.

The "34% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (75% of and 34% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.

1440p Ultra

1440p QHD — max settings

AVG FPS
RTX 3050
25.1fps(100%)
RX 6500 XT
16fps(64%)
WinnerRTX 3050
+57% faster
General Explanation of Benchmark Percentages

When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:

"X% of the performance"

This compares the slower card to the faster card.

Formula: (RX 6500 XT FPS ÷ RTX 3050 FPS) × 100
Example: (16 ÷ 25.1) × 100 = 64%
"X% faster"

This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.

Formula: ((RTX 3050 FPS - RX 6500 XT FPS) ÷ RX 6500 XT FPS) × 100
Example: ((25.1 - 16) ÷ 16) × 100 = 57%
Why Someone Might Get Confused:

You naturally think: "If RX 6500 XT is only 64% as fast, then RTX 3050 should be 36% faster" — but that's incorrect.

The "57% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (64% of and 57% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.

4K Ultra

3840×2160 — max settings

AVG FPS
RTX 3050
14.2fps(100%)
RX 6500 XT
7.6fps(54%)
WinnerRTX 3050
+87% faster
General Explanation of Benchmark Percentages

When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:

"X% of the performance"

This compares the slower card to the faster card.

Formula: (RX 6500 XT FPS ÷ RTX 3050 FPS) × 100
Example: (7.6 ÷ 14.2) × 100 = 54%
"X% faster"

This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.

Formula: ((RTX 3050 FPS - RX 6500 XT FPS) ÷ RX 6500 XT FPS) × 100
Example: ((14.2 - 7.6) ÷ 7.6) × 100 = 87%
Why Someone Might Get Confused:

You naturally think: "If RX 6500 XT is only 54% as fast, then RTX 3050 should be 46% faster" — but that's incorrect.

The "87% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (54% of and 87% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.

Efficiency Coefficient 1080p Ultra (Higher = Better Value)

Performance delivered per currency unit: FPS/$

RTX 3050
0.188 Value79% Efficiency
RX 6500 XT
0.239 Value100% Efficiency