GTX 1660 Super vs RTX 3050 6GB

GPU Head-to-Head · FPS & Value Comparison

GTX 1660 Super vs RTX 3050 6GB: Gaming Performance Comparison in 1080p Ultra

In gaming, the GTX 1660 Super delivers approximately +10% higher frame rates compared to the RTX 3050 6GB in 1080p Ultra (both featuring 6GB VRAM). For budget-conscious buyers, the GTX 1660 Super currently offers +57.6% better value, available at a $58.57 price difference.

GTX 1660 Super Advantages

Up to 10% faster in gaming benchmarks on average – 38 vs 35 FPS

Up to 57.6% better value for money – $3.54 vs $5.58/FPS

Costs only 70% of the price – $136 vs $194 (30% cheaper)

RTX 3050 6GB Advantages

Is newer – 2024-02-02 vs 2019-10-01

Consumes up to 44% less energy – 70W vs 125W

Performance Analytics

Average FPS across 21 games · all benchmarks use the same test suite

1080p Ultra

Full HD — max settings

AVG FPS
GTX 1660 Super
38.3fps(100%)
RTX 3050 6GB
34.8fps(91%)
WinnerGTX 1660 Super
+10% faster
General Explanation of Benchmark Percentages

When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:

"X% of the performance"

This compares the slower card to the faster card.

Formula: (RTX 3050 6GB FPS ÷ GTX 1660 Super FPS) × 100
Example: (34.8 ÷ 38.3) × 100 = 91%
"X% faster"

This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.

Formula: ((GTX 1660 Super FPS - RTX 3050 6GB FPS) ÷ RTX 3050 6GB FPS) × 100
Example: ((38.3 - 34.8) ÷ 34.8) × 100 = 10%
Why Someone Might Get Confused:

You naturally think: "If RTX 3050 6GB is only 91% as fast, then GTX 1660 Super should be 9% faster" — but that's incorrect.

The "10% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (91% of and 10% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.

1440p Ultra

1440p QHD — max settings

AVG FPS
GTX 1660 Super
23.8fps(100%)
RTX 3050 6GB
22.9fps(96%)
WinnerGTX 1660 Super
+4% faster
General Explanation of Benchmark Percentages

When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:

"X% of the performance"

This compares the slower card to the faster card.

Formula: (RTX 3050 6GB FPS ÷ GTX 1660 Super FPS) × 100
Example: (22.9 ÷ 23.8) × 100 = 96%
"X% faster"

This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.

Formula: ((GTX 1660 Super FPS - RTX 3050 6GB FPS) ÷ RTX 3050 6GB FPS) × 100
Example: ((23.8 - 22.9) ÷ 22.9) × 100 = 4%
Why Someone Might Get Confused:

You naturally think: "If RTX 3050 6GB is only 96% as fast, then GTX 1660 Super should be 4% faster" — but that's incorrect.

The "4% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (96% of and 4% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.

4K Ultra

3840×2160 — max settings

AVG FPS
GTX 1660 Super
12.6fps(100%)
RTX 3050 6GB
11.2fps(89%)
WinnerGTX 1660 Super
+13% faster
General Explanation of Benchmark Percentages

When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:

"X% of the performance"

This compares the slower card to the faster card.

Formula: (RTX 3050 6GB FPS ÷ GTX 1660 Super FPS) × 100
Example: (11.2 ÷ 12.6) × 100 = 89%
"X% faster"

This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.

Formula: ((GTX 1660 Super FPS - RTX 3050 6GB FPS) ÷ RTX 3050 6GB FPS) × 100
Example: ((12.6 - 11.2) ÷ 11.2) × 100 = 13%
Why Someone Might Get Confused:

You naturally think: "If RTX 3050 6GB is only 89% as fast, then GTX 1660 Super should be 11% faster" — but that's incorrect.

The "13% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (89% of and 13% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.

Efficiency Coefficient 1080p Ultra (Higher = Better Value)

Performance delivered per currency unit: FPS/$

GTX 1660 Super
0.282 Value100% Efficiency
RTX 3050 6GB
0.179 Value63% Efficiency