GTX 1660 Super vs RTX 3050

GPU Head-to-Head · FPS & Value Comparison

GTX 1660 Super vs RTX 3050: Gaming Performance Comparison in 1080p Ultra

In gaming, the GTX 1660 Super delivers approximately +2% higher frame rates compared to the RTX 3050 in 1080p Ultra. For budget-conscious buyers, the GTX 1660 Super currently offers +50.0% better value, available at a $64.70 price difference.

GTX 1660 Super Advantages

Up to 2% faster in gaming benchmarks on average – 38 vs 38 FPS

Up to 50.0% better value for money – $3.54 vs $5.32/FPS

Costs only 68% of the price – $136 vs $200 (32% cheaper)

Consumes up to 4% less energy – 125W vs 130W

RTX 3050 Advantages

33% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 6 GB

Is newer – 2022-01-27 vs 2019-10-01

Performance Analytics

Average FPS across 21 games · all benchmarks use the same test suite

1080p Ultra

Full HD — max settings

AVG FPS
GTX 1660 Super
38.3fps(100%)
RTX 3050
37.7fps(98%)
WinnerGTX 1660 Super
+2% faster
General Explanation of Benchmark Percentages

When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:

"X% of the performance"

This compares the slower card to the faster card.

Formula: (RTX 3050 FPS ÷ GTX 1660 Super FPS) × 100
Example: (37.7 ÷ 38.3) × 100 = 98%
"X% faster"

This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.

Formula: ((GTX 1660 Super FPS - RTX 3050 FPS) ÷ RTX 3050 FPS) × 100
Example: ((38.3 - 37.7) ÷ 37.7) × 100 = 2%
Why Someone Might Get Confused:

You naturally think: "If RTX 3050 is only 98% as fast, then GTX 1660 Super should be 2% faster" — but that's incorrect.

The "2% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (98% of and 2% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.

1440p Ultra

1440p QHD — max settings

AVG FPS
GTX 1660 Super
23.8fps(95%)
RTX 3050
25.1fps(100%)
WinnerRTX 3050
+5% faster
General Explanation of Benchmark Percentages

When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:

"X% of the performance"

This compares the slower card to the faster card.

Formula: (GTX 1660 Super FPS ÷ RTX 3050 FPS) × 100
Example: (23.8 ÷ 25.1) × 100 = 95%
"X% faster"

This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.

Formula: ((RTX 3050 FPS - GTX 1660 Super FPS) ÷ GTX 1660 Super FPS) × 100
Example: ((25.1 - 23.8) ÷ 23.8) × 100 = 5%
Why Someone Might Get Confused:

You naturally think: "If GTX 1660 Super is only 95% as fast, then RTX 3050 should be 5% faster" — but that's incorrect.

The "5% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (95% of and 5% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.

4K Ultra

3840×2160 — max settings

AVG FPS
GTX 1660 Super
12.6fps(89%)
RTX 3050
14.2fps(100%)
WinnerRTX 3050
+13% faster
General Explanation of Benchmark Percentages

When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:

"X% of the performance"

This compares the slower card to the faster card.

Formula: (GTX 1660 Super FPS ÷ RTX 3050 FPS) × 100
Example: (12.6 ÷ 14.2) × 100 = 89%
"X% faster"

This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.

Formula: ((RTX 3050 FPS - GTX 1660 Super FPS) ÷ GTX 1660 Super FPS) × 100
Example: ((14.2 - 12.6) ÷ 12.6) × 100 = 13%
Why Someone Might Get Confused:

You naturally think: "If GTX 1660 Super is only 89% as fast, then RTX 3050 should be 11% faster" — but that's incorrect.

The "13% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (89% of and 13% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.

Efficiency Coefficient 1080p Ultra (Higher = Better Value)

Performance delivered per currency unit: FPS/$

GTX 1660 Super
0.282 Value100% Efficiency
RTX 3050
0.188 Value67% Efficiency