B570 vs A770 16GB
GPU Head-to-Head · FPS & Value Comparison
B570 vs A770 16GB: Gaming Performance Comparison in 1080p Ultra
In gaming, the B570 delivers approximately +2% higher frame rates compared to the A770 16GB in 1080p Ultra. For budget-conscious buyers, the B570 currently offers +32.4% better value, available at a $78.90 price difference.
B570 Advantages
Up to 2% faster in gaming benchmarks on average – 54 vs 53 FPS
Up to 32.4% better value for money – $4.90 vs $6.48/FPS
Costs only 77% of the price – $263 vs $342 (23% cheaper)
Is newer – 2025-01-01 vs 2022-10-01
A770 16GB Advantages
60% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 10 GB
Performance Analytics
Average FPS across 21 games · all benchmarks use the same test suite
1080p Medium
Entry / competitive gaming
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (63.4 ÷ 72.4) × 100 = 88%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((72.4 - 63.4) ÷ 63.4) × 100 = 14%
You naturally think: "If A770 16GB is only 88% as fast, then B570 should be 12% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "14% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (88% of and 14% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
1080p Ultra
Full HD — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (52.8 ÷ 53.8) × 100 = 98%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((53.8 - 52.8) ÷ 52.8) × 100 = 2%
You naturally think: "If A770 16GB is only 98% as fast, then B570 should be 2% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "2% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (98% of and 2% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
1440p Ultra
1440p QHD — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (35.1 ÷ 36.5) × 100 = 96%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((36.5 - 35.1) ÷ 35.1) × 100 = 4%
You naturally think: "If B570 is only 96% as fast, then A770 16GB should be 4% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "4% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (96% of and 4% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
4K Ultra
3840×2160 — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (16.3 ÷ 22.3) × 100 = 73%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((22.3 - 16.3) ÷ 16.3) × 100 = 37%
You naturally think: "If B570 is only 73% as fast, then A770 16GB should be 27% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "37% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (73% of and 37% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
Efficiency Coefficient 1080p Ultra (Higher = Better Value)
Performance delivered per currency unit: FPS/$