A770 16GB vs RX 5600 XT

GPU Head-to-Head · FPS & Value Comparison

A770 16GB vs RX 5600 XT: Gaming Performance Comparison in 1080p Ultra

In gaming, the A770 16GB delivers approximately +15% higher frame rates compared to the RX 5600 XT in 1080p Ultra. For budget-conscious buyers, the RX 5600 XT currently offers +102.4% better value, available at a $191 price difference.

A770 16GB Advantages

Up to 15% faster in gaming benchmarks on average – 53 vs 46 FPS

167% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 6 GB

Is newer – 2022-10-01 vs 2020-01-01

RX 5600 XT Advantages

Up to 102.4% better value for money – $3.13 vs $6.34/FPS

Costs only 43% of the price – $143 vs $335 (57% cheaper)

Consumes up to 33% less energy – 150W vs 225W

Performance Analytics

Average FPS across 21 games · all benchmarks use the same test suite

1080p Ultra

Full HD — max settings

AVG FPS
A770 16GB
52.8fps(100%)
RX 5600 XT
45.8fps(87%)
WinnerA770 16GB
+15% faster
General Explanation of Benchmark Percentages

When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:

"X% of the performance"

This compares the slower card to the faster card.

Formula: (RX 5600 XT FPS ÷ A770 16GB FPS) × 100
Example: (45.8 ÷ 52.8) × 100 = 87%
"X% faster"

This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.

Formula: ((A770 16GB FPS - RX 5600 XT FPS) ÷ RX 5600 XT FPS) × 100
Example: ((52.8 - 45.8) ÷ 45.8) × 100 = 15%
Why Someone Might Get Confused:

You naturally think: "If RX 5600 XT is only 87% as fast, then A770 16GB should be 13% faster" — but that's incorrect.

The "15% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (87% of and 15% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.

1440p Ultra

1440p QHD — max settings

AVG FPS
A770 16GB
36.5fps(100%)
RX 5600 XT
28.6fps(78%)
WinnerA770 16GB
+28% faster
General Explanation of Benchmark Percentages

When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:

"X% of the performance"

This compares the slower card to the faster card.

Formula: (RX 5600 XT FPS ÷ A770 16GB FPS) × 100
Example: (28.6 ÷ 36.5) × 100 = 78%
"X% faster"

This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.

Formula: ((A770 16GB FPS - RX 5600 XT FPS) ÷ RX 5600 XT FPS) × 100
Example: ((36.5 - 28.6) ÷ 28.6) × 100 = 28%
Why Someone Might Get Confused:

You naturally think: "If RX 5600 XT is only 78% as fast, then A770 16GB should be 22% faster" — but that's incorrect.

The "28% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (78% of and 28% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.

4K Ultra

3840×2160 — max settings

AVG FPS
A770 16GB
22.3fps(100%)
RX 5600 XT
15.5fps(70%)
WinnerA770 16GB
+44% faster
General Explanation of Benchmark Percentages

When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:

"X% of the performance"

This compares the slower card to the faster card.

Formula: (RX 5600 XT FPS ÷ A770 16GB FPS) × 100
Example: (15.5 ÷ 22.3) × 100 = 70%
"X% faster"

This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.

Formula: ((A770 16GB FPS - RX 5600 XT FPS) ÷ RX 5600 XT FPS) × 100
Example: ((22.3 - 15.5) ÷ 15.5) × 100 = 44%
Why Someone Might Get Confused:

You naturally think: "If RX 5600 XT is only 70% as fast, then A770 16GB should be 30% faster" — but that's incorrect.

The "44% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (70% of and 44% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.

Efficiency Coefficient 1080p Ultra (Higher = Better Value)

Performance delivered per currency unit: FPS/$

A770 16GB
0.158 Value49% Efficiency
RX 5600 XT
0.319 Value100% Efficiency