A770 16GB vs A750
GPU Head-to-Head · FPS & Value Comparison
A770 16GB vs A750: Gaming Performance Comparison in 1080p Ultra
In gaming, the A770 16GB delivers approximately +15% higher frame rates compared to the A750 in 1080p Ultra. For budget-conscious buyers, the A750 currently offers +41.1% better value, available at a $132 price difference.
A770 16GB Advantages
Up to 15% faster in gaming benchmarks on average – 53 vs 46 FPS
100% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 8 GB
A750 Advantages
Up to 41.1% better value for money – $4.59 vs $6.48/FPS
Costs only 61% of the price – $210 vs $342 (39% cheaper)
Performance Analytics
Average FPS across 21 games · all benchmarks use the same test suite
1080p Medium
Entry / competitive gaming
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (57.4 ÷ 63.4) × 100 = 91%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((63.4 - 57.4) ÷ 57.4) × 100 = 10%
You naturally think: "If A750 is only 91% as fast, then A770 16GB should be 9% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "10% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (91% of and 10% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
1080p Ultra
Full HD — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (45.8 ÷ 52.8) × 100 = 87%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((52.8 - 45.8) ÷ 45.8) × 100 = 15%
You naturally think: "If A750 is only 87% as fast, then A770 16GB should be 13% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "15% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (87% of and 15% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
1440p Ultra
1440p QHD — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (30.7 ÷ 36.5) × 100 = 84%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((36.5 - 30.7) ÷ 30.7) × 100 = 19%
You naturally think: "If A750 is only 84% as fast, then A770 16GB should be 16% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "19% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (84% of and 19% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
4K Ultra
3840×2160 — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (17 ÷ 22.3) × 100 = 76%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((22.3 - 17) ÷ 17) × 100 = 31%
You naturally think: "If A750 is only 76% as fast, then A770 16GB should be 24% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "31% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (76% of and 31% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
Efficiency Coefficient 1080p Ultra (Higher = Better Value)
Performance delivered per currency unit: FPS/$