A750 vs RTX 3050 6GB
GPU Head-to-Head · FPS & Value Comparison
A750 vs RTX 3050 6GB: Gaming Performance Comparison in 1080p Ultra
In gaming, the A750 delivers approximately +32% higher frame rates compared to the RTX 3050 6GB in 1080p Ultra. For budget-conscious buyers, the A750 currently offers +23.3% better value, available at a $13.23 price difference.
A750 Advantages
Up to 32% faster in gaming benchmarks on average – 46 vs 35 FPS
Up to 23.3% better value for money – $4.59 vs $5.66/FPS
33% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 6 GB
RTX 3050 6GB Advantages
Costs only 94% of the price – $197 vs $210 (6% cheaper)
Is newer – 2024-02-02 vs 2022-10-01
Consumes up to 69% less energy – 70W vs 225W
Performance Analytics
Average FPS across 21 games · all benchmarks use the same test suite
1080p Medium
Entry / competitive gaming
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (50.9 ÷ 57.4) × 100 = 89%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((57.4 - 50.9) ÷ 50.9) × 100 = 13%
You naturally think: "If RTX 3050 6GB is only 89% as fast, then A750 should be 11% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "13% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (89% of and 13% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
1080p Ultra
Full HD — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (34.8 ÷ 45.8) × 100 = 76%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((45.8 - 34.8) ÷ 34.8) × 100 = 32%
You naturally think: "If RTX 3050 6GB is only 76% as fast, then A750 should be 24% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "32% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (76% of and 32% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
1440p Ultra
1440p QHD — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (22.9 ÷ 30.7) × 100 = 75%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((30.7 - 22.9) ÷ 22.9) × 100 = 34%
You naturally think: "If RTX 3050 6GB is only 75% as fast, then A750 should be 25% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "34% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (75% of and 34% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
4K Ultra
3840×2160 — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (11.2 ÷ 17) × 100 = 66%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((17 - 11.2) ÷ 11.2) × 100 = 52%
You naturally think: "If RTX 3050 6GB is only 66% as fast, then A750 should be 34% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "52% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (66% of and 52% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
Efficiency Coefficient 1080p Ultra (Higher = Better Value)
Performance delivered per currency unit: FPS/$