A750 vs RTX 3050
GPU Head-to-Head · FPS & Value Comparison
A750 vs RTX 3050: Gaming Performance Comparison in 1080p Ultra
In gaming, the A750 delivers approximately +21% higher frame rates compared to the RTX 3050 in 1080p Ultra (both featuring 8GB VRAM). For budget-conscious buyers, the A750 currently offers +18.3% better value, available at a $5.52 price difference.
A750 Advantages
Up to 21% faster in gaming benchmarks on average – 46 vs 38 FPS
Up to 18.3% better value for money – $4.59 vs $5.43/FPS
Is newer – 2022-10-01 vs 2022-01-27
RTX 3050 Advantages
Costs only 97% of the price – $205 vs $210 (3% cheaper)
Consumes up to 42% less energy – 130W vs 225W
Performance Analytics
Average FPS across 21 games · all benchmarks use the same test suite
1080p Ultra
Full HD — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (37.7 ÷ 45.8) × 100 = 82%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((45.8 - 37.7) ÷ 37.7) × 100 = 21%
You naturally think: "If RTX 3050 is only 82% as fast, then A750 should be 18% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "21% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (82% of and 21% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
1440p Ultra
1440p QHD — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (25.1 ÷ 30.7) × 100 = 82%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((30.7 - 25.1) ÷ 25.1) × 100 = 22%
You naturally think: "If RTX 3050 is only 82% as fast, then A750 should be 18% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "22% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (82% of and 22% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
4K Ultra
3840×2160 — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (14.2 ÷ 17) × 100 = 84%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((17 - 14.2) ÷ 14.2) × 100 = 20%
You naturally think: "If RTX 3050 is only 84% as fast, then A750 should be 16% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "20% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (84% of and 20% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
Efficiency Coefficient 1080p Ultra (Higher = Better Value)
Performance delivered per currency unit: FPS/$