A750 vs GTX 1660 Super

GPU Head-to-Head · FPS & Value Comparison

A750 vs GTX 1660 Super: Gaming Performance Comparison in 1080p Ultra

In gaming, the A750 delivers approximately +20% higher frame rates compared to the GTX 1660 Super in 1080p Ultra. For budget-conscious buyers, the GTX 1660 Super currently offers +27.0% better value, available at a $70.40 price difference.

A750 Advantages

Up to 20% faster in gaming benchmarks on average – 46 vs 38 FPS

33% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 6 GB

Is newer – 2022-10-01 vs 2019-10-01

GTX 1660 Super Advantages

Up to 27.0% better value for money – $3.54 vs $4.50/FPS

Costs only 66% of the price – $136 vs $206 (34% cheaper)

Consumes up to 44% less energy – 125W vs 225W

Performance Analytics

Average FPS across 21 games · all benchmarks use the same test suite

1080p Ultra

Full HD — max settings

AVG FPS
A750
45.8fps(100%)
GTX 1660 Super
38.3fps(84%)
WinnerA750
+20% faster
General Explanation of Benchmark Percentages

When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:

"X% of the performance"

This compares the slower card to the faster card.

Formula: (GTX 1660 Super FPS ÷ A750 FPS) × 100
Example: (38.3 ÷ 45.8) × 100 = 84%
"X% faster"

This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.

Formula: ((A750 FPS - GTX 1660 Super FPS) ÷ GTX 1660 Super FPS) × 100
Example: ((45.8 - 38.3) ÷ 38.3) × 100 = 20%
Why Someone Might Get Confused:

You naturally think: "If GTX 1660 Super is only 84% as fast, then A750 should be 16% faster" — but that's incorrect.

The "20% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (84% of and 20% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.

1440p Ultra

1440p QHD — max settings

AVG FPS
A750
30.7fps(100%)
GTX 1660 Super
23.8fps(78%)
WinnerA750
+29% faster
General Explanation of Benchmark Percentages

When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:

"X% of the performance"

This compares the slower card to the faster card.

Formula: (GTX 1660 Super FPS ÷ A750 FPS) × 100
Example: (23.8 ÷ 30.7) × 100 = 78%
"X% faster"

This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.

Formula: ((A750 FPS - GTX 1660 Super FPS) ÷ GTX 1660 Super FPS) × 100
Example: ((30.7 - 23.8) ÷ 23.8) × 100 = 29%
Why Someone Might Get Confused:

You naturally think: "If GTX 1660 Super is only 78% as fast, then A750 should be 22% faster" — but that's incorrect.

The "29% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (78% of and 29% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.

4K Ultra

3840×2160 — max settings

AVG FPS
A750
17fps(100%)
GTX 1660 Super
12.6fps(74%)
WinnerA750
+35% faster
General Explanation of Benchmark Percentages

When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:

"X% of the performance"

This compares the slower card to the faster card.

Formula: (GTX 1660 Super FPS ÷ A750 FPS) × 100
Example: (12.6 ÷ 17) × 100 = 74%
"X% faster"

This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.

Formula: ((A750 FPS - GTX 1660 Super FPS) ÷ GTX 1660 Super FPS) × 100
Example: ((17 - 12.6) ÷ 12.6) × 100 = 35%
Why Someone Might Get Confused:

You naturally think: "If GTX 1660 Super is only 74% as fast, then A750 should be 26% faster" — but that's incorrect.

The "35% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (74% of and 35% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.

Efficiency Coefficient 1080p Ultra (Higher = Better Value)

Performance delivered per currency unit: FPS/$

A750
0.222 Value79% Efficiency
GTX 1660 Super
0.282 Value100% Efficiency